【24h】

Moving Into Green Healthy Housing

机译:迈向绿色健康住房

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Green building systems have proliferated but health outcomes and associated costs and benefits remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare health before and after families moved into new green healthy housing with a control group in traditionally repaired housing. Design and Setting: Mixed methods study in 3 Chicago housing developments. Participants: Public housing and low-income subsidized households (n = 325 apartments with 803 individuals). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported health status, visual assessment of housing condition, indoor air sampling, and Medicaid expenditure and diagnostic data. Medicaid expenditures and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were modeled using a generalized linear model with. distribution and log-link. Results: Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved significantly in the green healthy housing study group compared with both the control group and the dilapidated public housing from which the residents moved, as did hay fever, headaches, sinusitis, angina, and respiratory allergy. Asthma severity measured by self-reported lost school/work days, disturbed sleep, and symptoms improved significantly, as did sadness, nervousness, restlessness, and child behavior. Medicaid data in this exploratory study were inconclusive and inconsistent with self-reported health outcomes and visual assessment data on housing quality but hold promise for future investigation. Possible sources of bias in the Medicaid data include older age in the study group, changes in Medicaid eligibility over time, controlling for Medicaid costs in an urban area, and the increased stress associated with moving, even if the move is into better housing. Conclusion: The mixed method approach employed here describes the complex relationships among self-reported health, housing conditions, environmental measures, and clinical data. Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved in green healthy housing. Health care cost savings in Medicaid due to improved housing could not be quantified here but hold promise for future investigations with larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.
机译:背景:绿色建筑系统激增,但人们对健康结果以及相关的成本和收益知之甚少。目的:比较家庭搬进新的绿色健康住房前后的健康状况,并与对照组进行传统维修的住房进行比较。设计与设置:在3个芝加哥房屋开发中进行混合方法研究。参加者:公共住房和低收入补贴家庭(n = 325套公寓,有803个人)。主要结果指标:自我报告的健康状况,房屋状况的视觉评估,室内空气采样以及医疗补助支出和诊断数据。医疗补助支出和《国际疾病分类》(第九修订版)使用的通用线性模型建模。分布和日志链接。结果:绿色健康住房研究组的住房条件和自我报告的身心健康状况明显好于对照组和居民搬迁的残旧公共住房,花粉症,头痛,鼻窦炎,心绞痛和呼吸道过敏。通过自我报告的失学/工作日,睡眠不安和症状来衡量的哮喘严重程度得到了显着改善,悲伤,神经质,躁动和儿童行为也得到了改善。这项探索性研究中的医疗补助数据尚无定论,并且与自我报告的健康结果以及有关住房质量的视觉评估数据不一致,但有望为将来的调查提供依据。医疗补助数据的可能偏差来源包括研究组的年龄较大,医疗补助资格随时间的变化,控制城市地区的医疗补助成本以及与搬迁相关的压力增加,即使搬迁是为了改善住房条件。结论:此处采用的混合方法描述了自我报告的健康状况,居住条件,环境措施和临床数据之间的复杂关系。绿色健康的住房改善了住房条件和自我报告的身心健康。由于住房改善而导致的医疗补助节省的医疗成本在这里无法量化,但有望在更长的随访期内为更多人群的未来研究做准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号