首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >An analysis of root cause identification and continuous quality improvement in public health H1N1 after-action reports
【24h】

An analysis of root cause identification and continuous quality improvement in public health H1N1 after-action reports

机译:公共卫生H1N1事后报告的根本原因识别和持续质量改进分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To identify the extent to which the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program's (HSEEP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) template was followed by public health entities and facilitated the identification of detailed corrective actions and continuous improvement. Design: Data were drawn from the US H1N1 Public Health Emergency Response (PHER) federal grant awardees (n = 62). After action report/improvement plan text was examined to identify the presence of AAR/IP HSEEP elements and characterized as "minimally complete," "partially complete," or "complete." Corrective actions (CA) and recommendations within the IP focusing on performance deficits were coded as specific, measurable, and time-bound, and whether they were associated with a problem that met root cause criteria and whether the CA/recommendation was intended to address or fix the root cause. Main outcome measures: A total of 2619 CA/recommendations were identified. More than half (n = 1480, 57%) addressed root causes. Corrective actions/recommendations associated with complete AARs more frequently addressed root cause (58% vs 51%, χ = 9.1, P < 0.003) and were more specific (34% vs 23%, χ = 32.3, P < 0.0001), measurable (30% vs 18%, χ = 37.9, P < 0.0001), and time-bound (38% vs 15%, χ = 115.5, P < 0.0001) than partially complete AARs. The same pattern was not observed with completeness of IPs. Corrective actions and recommendations were similarly specific and measurable. Recommendations significantly addressed root cause more than CAs. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates a possible lack of awardee distinction between CA and recommendations in AARs. As HSEEP adapts to align with the 2011 National Preparedness Goal and National Preparedness System, future HSEEP documents should emphasize the importance of root cause analysis as a required element within AAR documents and templates in the exercise and real incident environment, as well as the need for specific and measurable CAs.
机译:目的:确定公共卫生实体遵循国土安全演习和评估计划(HSEEP)行动后报告/改进计划(AAR / IP)模板的程度,并有助于识别详细的纠正措施和持续改进。设计:数据来自美国H1N1公共卫生紧急响应(PHER)联邦资助受赠者(n = 62)。在检查了行动报告/改进计划文本后,确定了AAR / IP HSEEP元素的存在,并以“最小完成”,“部分完成”或“完成”为特征。 IP中针对绩效缺陷的纠正措施(CA)和建议被编码为特定,可衡量和有时限的,以及它们是否与符合根本原因标准的问题相关,以及CA /建议是否旨在解决或纠正。解决根本原因。主要结果指标:总共确定了2619个CA /建议。超过一半(n = 1480,57%)解决了根本原因。与完全AAR相关的纠正措施/建议更能解决根本原因(58%vs 51%,χ= 9.1,P <0.003),更具体(34%vs 23%,χ= 32.3,P <0.0001),可测量( 30%vs 18%,χ= 37.9,P <0.0001)和时限(38%vs 15%,χ= 115.5,P <0.0001) IP的完整性未观察到相同的模式。纠正措施和建议同样具有针对性和可衡量性。与CA相比,建议书更着重于解决根本原因。结论:我们的分析表明,CA与AAR中的建议之间可能缺乏获奖者的区别。由于HSEEP适应以适应2011年国家防备目标和国家防备系统,因此未来的HSEEP文件应强调根本原因分析作为演习和实际事故环境中AAR文件和模板中必不可少的要素的重要性,以及特定且可衡量的CA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号