首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >Self-Reported Leadership Styles of Deans of Baccalaureate and Higher Degree Nursing Programs in the United States
【24h】

Self-Reported Leadership Styles of Deans of Baccalaureate and Higher Degree Nursing Programs in the United States

机译:美国学士学位和更高学位护理课程院长的自我报告领导风格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past decade there has been a lack of attention in the discipline paid to developing strong academic leaders. It is widely acknowledged that the role of the dean has shifted dramatically over the past two decades, with an increasing emphasis on interaction with and accountability to external constituencies at the university, community, and national levels. The overall purpose of this study was to investigate the self-reported leadership styles, behaviors, and experiences of deans of schools of nursing in the United States. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was sent to 655 deans who were members of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing; 344 returned completed surveys for a return rate of 52.5%. Scores on the transformational scale (n = 321; 20 items) ranged from 2.75 to 4.0, with a mean of 3.79; transactional scores ranged from 1.3 to 4.0, with a mean of 3.3 and mode of 3.5. The passive leadership component was lowest, with a range of 0 to 3.75, mean of 1.1, and mode of 1.0. The highest scores for each dean were then examined and compared across the three components. Seventy-seven percent of the deans' highest scores fell on the transformational, 21% on the transactional, and 2% on the passive-avoidant scale. There were no significant differences in the most commonly reported leadership behaviors by gender, ethnicity, or terminal degree. Deans of nursing, compared with over 3,000 other leaders who have completed the MLQ, ranked in the 80th percentile for self-reported transformative behaviors and outcomes effectiveness. The findings from this sample, who were predominantly female, are congruent with previous research on women leaders. Recommendations for future research leadership development programs are presented.
机译:在过去的十年中,该学科缺乏对培养强大的学术领导者的重视。众所周知,在过去的二十年中,院长的角色发生了巨大变化,并越来越重视与大学,社区和国家层面的外部选民的互动和对他们的问责。这项研究的总体目的是调查美国护理学院院长的自我报告的领导风格,行为和经历。多因素领导力调查问卷(MLQ)已发送给655位院长,这些院长是美国护理学院协会的成员; 344个返回的已完成调查问卷的返回率为52.5%。转型量表的分数(n = 321; 20个项目)在2.75到4.0之间,平均分为3.79;交易得分范围从1.3到4.0,平均值为3.3,众数为3.5。被动领导力成分最低,范围为0到3.75,平均值为1.1,众数为1.0。然后检查每个教务长的最高分,并在三个部分中进行比较。院长最高分数的百分之七十七属于转型型,事务性占21%,被动回避型占2%。在最常报告的领导行为中,没有性别,种族或末级程度的差异。与3,000多位完成MLQ的领导者相比,护理院长在自我报告的变革行为和结果有效性方面排名第80位。该样本的调查结果主要是女性,与先前有关女性领导者的研究一致。提出了有关未来研究领导力发展计划的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号