首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology >COMPARISON OF THREE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-BASED METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN FOOD
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THREE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-BASED METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN FOOD

机译:三种基于聚合酶链反应的食品中雌激素单核细胞增多性基因检测方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three PCR-based methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food (BAX for Screening, Probelia and a method according to Kaclikovd et al. (2003) were compared on the basis of the determination of detection limits for 15 artificially contaminated food products. Detection limits of all methods for all samples were 10~0 cfu per 10 g, with the exception of three cheese samples which did not produce valid results because of the inhibition of Probelia PCR. Detection limits for nonviable L. monocytogenes cells were sufficiently high (>=10~9 cfu per 10 g) for BAX and the method according to Kaclikovd et al. (2003), but considerably low (<=10~6 cfu per 10 g) for Probelia. The results demonstrate that BAX for Screening as well as the Kaclikovd etal. (2001) method fulfill the sensitivity requirements for a rapid alternative method for the detection of L. monocytogenes in food, which would be equivalent to the standard method EN ISO 11290-1.
机译:在确定15种人工污染食品的检出限的基础上,比较了三种基于PCR的食品单核细胞增生李斯特菌检测方法(BAX筛选,Probelia方法和Kaclikovd等人(2003年)方法)。所有样品的所有方法的限值均为10〜10 cfu / 10 g,但三个奶酪样品因Probelia PCR的抑制而无法产生有效结果。单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌细胞的检测限足够高(> BAX和Kaclikovd等人(2003)的方法分别为= 10〜9 cfu / 10 g),但对于Probelia来说则很低(<= 10〜6 cfu / 10 g)。由于Kaclikovd等人(2001)的方法满足了检测食品中单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌的快速替代方法的灵敏度要求,这相当于标准方法EN ISO 11290-1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号