...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in general medical outpatients compared with usual care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in general medical outpatients compared with usual care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.

机译:与常规护理相比,普通科门诊由护士主导的病例管理干预措施的成本效益:经济评估和随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led, home-based, case-management intervention (NHI) after hospital discharge in addition to usual care. METHODS: Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial after being discharged home with 24 weeks of follow-up. Patients discharged to their home from a general hospital were randomly assigned to NHI or usual care. Clinical outcomes were frequency of emergency readmissions, quality of life, and psychological functioning. Direct costs were measured by means of cost diaries kept by the patients and information obtained from the patients' pharmacists. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were randomized, 61 patients dropped out, and 26 had incomplete data, leaving a total of 121 patients included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in emergency readmissions, quality of life, and psychological functioning. There was a substantial difference in total costs between the NHI group and the control group (4286 Euro; 95% CI, -41; 8026), but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: NHI is not a cost-effective intervention. We do not recommend the implementation of this intervention in populations that do not consist of severely vulnerable and complex patients. Future studies should include complexity assessment on inclusion and evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this intervention in patients with more complex profiles.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估除常规护理外,出院后由护士主导的家庭式病例管理干预措施(NHI)的成本效益。方法:经济评估以及一项随机对照试验,出院后进行了24周的随访。从综合医院出院回家的患者被随机分配到NHI或常规护理中。临床结果是紧急再入院的频率,生活质量和心理功能。通过患者保存的费用日记和从患者的药剂师获得的信息来测量直接费用。结果:共有208例患者被随机分组​​,61例退出研究,26例数据不完整,最终分析中共有121例患者。紧急再入院,生活质量和心理功能方面无统计学差异。 NHI组和对照组之间的总费用之间存在显着差异(4286欧元; 95%CI,-41; 8026),但该差异在统计学上并不显着。结论:NHI不是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。我们不建议在没有严重脆弱和复杂患者的人群中实施这种干预措施。未来的研究应包括纳入的复杂性评估,并评估具有更复杂特征的患者的这种干预措施的有效性和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号