...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis >Multi-objective Approaches to the Unit Crewing Problem in Airline Crew Scheduling
【24h】

Multi-objective Approaches to the Unit Crewing Problem in Airline Crew Scheduling

机译:机组机组排班问题的多目标求解方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of the crew pairing problem is to partition a flight schedule into sequences of flights called pairings that crew members can operate at minimum cost. It is solved for each crew rank, for example, captains and first officers. In optimised crew pairings, crew often split and join other crew to operate outgoing flights. Because minimum cost pairings contain little buffer time, crew splitting after a delayed flight contributes to the propagation of delay. This effect can be avoided by unit crewing, that is, by keeping crew of different ranks together for as long as possible during a pairing. However, increasing unit crewing increases cost. We investigate sequential and parallel methods for unit crewing, explicitly considering the two objectives of minimising cost and maximising unit crewing. We apply multi-objective techniques in the sequential approach, where the (minimum cost) pairing problem for one crew rank is solved first and both objectives feature when solving for the second crew rank. Because the quality of the pairings obtained by this method is limited by the solution for the first crew rank, we then propose to solve the two crew pairing problems simultaneously, again using multi-objective optimisation methods. We introduce a multi-objective optimisation model for this problem and propose a new heuristic branching technique that favours unit crewed pairings when applied to a scalarised model with an auxiliary objective function. We compare this with a direct approach with management of the number of unit crewing constraints and a Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition approach. Numerical tests on domestic New Zealand data show that the multi-objective approaches considerably increase the level of unit crewing, without much increase in cost, even in the sequential approach. Moreover, we show that the parallel approach is superior in terms of quality of the pairing solution but computationally more expensive. The heuristic branching technique provides good quality solutions in reasonable time, as compared with the Dantzig-Wolfe method.
机译:机组配对问题的目标是将飞行时间表分为称为配对的一系列飞行,机组可以以最低的成本进行配对。它针对每个船员级别(例如,船长和副驾驶)解决。在优化的机组配对中,机组通常会拆分并与其他机组一起操作外向航班。因为最小成本配对几乎没有缓冲时间,所以机组人员在延误飞行后拆分会导致延误的传播。可以通过安排人员来避免这种影响,也就是说,通过在配对期间将不同级别的人员尽可能长时间地保持在一起。但是,增加单位人员会增加成本。我们研究顺序和并行的人员编制方法,明确考虑了最小化成本和最大化人员编制的两个目标。我们在顺序方法中应用多目标技术,其中首先解决一个机组人员的(最低成本)配对问题,而解决第二个机组人员的两个目标都具有特征。由于通过这种方法获得的配对的质量受到第一个机组排名的解决方案的限制,因此我们建议同时使用多目标优化方法同时解决两个机组配对问题。我们针对此问题引入了多目标优化模型,并提出了一种新的启发式分支技术,该技术在应用于带有辅助目标函数的标量模型时,更倾向于使用单位乘员配对。我们将这种方法与直接方法进行比较,该方法可以管理部队人员约束的数量,并且可以采用Dantzig-Wolfe分解方法。对新西兰国内数据的数值测试表明,即使采用顺序方法,多目标方法也大大增加了单位人员的配备水平,而成本却没有太大增加。此外,我们证明,在配对解决方案的质量方面,并行方法是优越的,但在计算上却更昂贵。与Dantzig-Wolfe方法相比,启发式分支技术在合理的时间内提供了高质量的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号