首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychopharmacology >Utility of saccadic eye movement analysis as an objective biomarker to detect the sedative interaction between opioids and sleep deprivation in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant populations.
【24h】

Utility of saccadic eye movement analysis as an objective biomarker to detect the sedative interaction between opioids and sleep deprivation in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant populations.

机译:眼泪运动分析作为客观生物标记物的实用性,可用于检测未接受过阿片类药物和阿片类药物的人群中阿片类药物与睡眠剥夺之间的镇静作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analysis of saccadic eye movements (SEMs) has previously been used to detect drug- and sleep-deprivation-induced sedation, but never in combination. We compared the effects of sleep deprivation and opioids on 10 opioid-naive with nine opioid-tolerant participants. The naive-participant study evaluated the effects of sleep deprivation alone, morphine alone and the combination; the tolerant-participant study compared day-to-day effects of alternate-daily-dosed buprenorphine and the combination of buprenorphine on the dosing day with sleep deprivation. Psychomotor impairment was measured using SEMs, a 5-minute pupil adaptation test (PAT), pupil light reflex (PLR) and alertness visual analogue scale (AVAS). The PAT and PLR did not detect sleep deprivation, in contrast to previous studies. Whilst consistently detecting sleep deprivation, the AVAS also detected buprenorphine in the tolerant study, but not morphine in the naive study. SEMs detected morphine alone and sleep deprivation alone as well as an additive interaction in the naive study and the effect of sleep deprivation in the tolerant study. The alternate-day buprenorphine dosing did not alter SEMs. The current study revealed greater SEMs, but not AVAS impairment in tolerant versus naive participants. The current study demonstrates that objective measures provide additional information to subjective measures and thus should be used in combination.
机译:眼跳运动的分析(SEM)以前曾用于检测药物和睡眠剥夺引起的镇静作用,但从未结合使用。我们将睡眠剥夺和阿片类药物对10例未使用过阿片类药物的患者与9名阿片耐受性参与者进行了比较。一项幼稚的研究评估了单独睡眠剥夺,单独使用吗啡及其组合的影响。耐受性参与研究比较了每日交替服用丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡联合用药在睡眠剥夺的每日影响。使用SEM,5分钟瞳孔适应测验(PAT),瞳孔光反射(PLR)和警觉视觉模拟量表(AVAS)测量精神运动障碍。与以前的研究相比,PAT和PLR没有检测到睡眠不足。在持续检测睡眠剥夺的同时,AVAS在耐受性研究中还检测到丁丙诺啡,但在幼稚研究中未检测到吗啡。 SEM在纯真的研究中检测到单独的吗啡和睡眠剥夺以及加性相互作用,在耐受性研究中检测到睡眠剥夺的影响。隔天的丁丙诺啡剂量没有改变SEM。当前的研究显示,相对于未接受试验的参与者,SEM的观察值更高,但对AVAS的损伤没有观察到。当前的研究表明,客观度量为主观度量提供了更多信息,因此应结合使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号