首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Plant Physiology >Soybean grown under elevated CO2 benefits more under low temperature than high temperature stress: Varying response of photosynthetic limitations, leaf metabolites, growth, and seed yield
【24h】

Soybean grown under elevated CO2 benefits more under low temperature than high temperature stress: Varying response of photosynthetic limitations, leaf metabolites, growth, and seed yield

机译:在高温下,CO2浓度升高的大豆比高温胁迫的益处更多:光合作用限制,叶片代谢产物,生长和种子产量的变化响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the combined effect of temperature and CO2 on photosynthetic processes, leaf metabolites and growth, soybean was grown under a controlled environment at low (22/18 degrees C, LT), optimum (28/24 degrees C, OT) and high (36/32 degrees C HT) temperatures under ambient (400 mu mol mol(-1); aCO(2)) or elevated (800 mu mol mol(-1); eCO(2)) CO2 concentrations during the reproductive stage. In general, the rate of photosynthesis (A), stomatal (g(s)) and mesophyll (g(m)) conductance, quantum yield of photosystem II, rates of maximum carboxylation (V-Cmax), and electron transport (J) increased with temperature across CO2 levels. However, compared with OT, the percentage increases in these parameters at HT were lower than the observed decline at LT. The photosynthetic limitation at LT and OT was primarily caused by photo-biochemical processes (49-58%, L-b) followed by stomatal (27-32%, L-s) and mesophyll (15-19%, L-m) limitations. However, at HT, it was primarily caused by L-s (41%) followed by L-b (33%) and L-m (26%). The dominance of L-b at LT and OT was associated with the accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates (e.g., starch) and several organic acids, whereas this accumulation did not occur at HT, indicating increased metabolic activities. Compared with OT, biomass and seed yield declined more at HT than at LT. The eCO(2) treatment compensated for the temperature-stress effects on biomass but only partially compensated for the effects on seed yield, especially at HT. Photosynthetic downregulation at eCO(2) was possibly due to the accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates and the decrease in g(s) and A(std) (standard A measured at 400 mu mol mol(-1) sub-stomatal CO2 concentration), as well as the lack of CO2 effect on g(m), V-Cmax,V- and J, and photosynthetic limitation. Thus, the photosynthetic limitation was temperature-dependent and was primarily influenced by the alteration in photo-biochemical processes and metabolic activities. Despite the inconsistent response of photosynthesis (or biomass accumulation) and seed yield, eCO(2) tended to fully or partially compensate for the adverse effect of the respective LT and HT stresses under well-watered and sufficient nutrient conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:为了评估温度和CO2对光合作用,叶片代谢产物和生长的综合影响,将大豆在低(22/18℃,LT),最佳(28/24℃,OT)和高(在生殖阶段处于环境(400μmol mol(-1); aCO(2))或升高的温度(800μmol mol(-1); eCO(2))之下的36/32摄氏度HT温度。通常,光合作用的速率(A),气孔(g(s))和叶肉(g(m))的电导率,光系统II的量子产率,最大羧化速率(V-Cmax)和电子传递(J)随着温度的升高,二氧化碳水平升高。但是,与OT相比,这些参数在HT处的增加百分比低于在LT处观察到的下降百分比。 LT和OT处的光合作用限制主要是由光生化过程(49-58%,L-b)引起的,其次是气孔(27-32%,L-s)和叶肉(15-19%,L-m)限制。但是,在HT,主要是由L-s(41%),其次是L-b(33%)和L-m(26%)引起的。 L-b在LT和OT的优势与非结构性碳水化合物(例如淀粉)和几种有机酸的积累有关,而这种积累在HT时没有发生,表明代谢活性增加。与OT相比,HT的生物量和种子产量下降幅度比LT下降幅度更大。 eCO(2)处理补偿了温度-压力对生物量的影响,但仅部分补偿了对种子产量的影响,尤其是在高温下。在eCO(2)处的光合作用下调可能是由于非结构性碳水化合物的积累以及g(s)和A(std)的降低(标准A在400μmol mol(-1)的亚气孔二氧化碳浓度下测得) ,以及对g(m),V-Cmax,V-和J以及光合作用限制的CO2缺乏影响。因此,光合作用的局限性是温度依赖性的,并且主要受光生化过程和代谢活性改变的影响。尽管光合作用(或生物量积累)和种子产量的响应不一致,但eCO(2)趋向于完全或部分补偿在充足的水分和充足的营养条件下相应的LT和HT胁迫的不利影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号