首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nutrition Education >Private versus public relief: Use of food pantries versus food stampsamong poor households
【24h】

Private versus public relief: Use of food pantries versus food stampsamong poor households

机译:私人救济与公共救济:贫困家庭中使用食品储藏室和食品券

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The research presented examines the role of Food Stamps versus food pantries in alleviating food shortages among poor households. First, multinomial legit models are used to examine which factors affect four alternate food assistance choices poor households make: (a) to use Food Stamps, (b) to use a food pantry (c) to use both programs, or (d) to use neither program. Second, the efficacy of food pantries and Food Stamps in alleviating food shortages is investigated by using binomial probit models, which estimate whether using Food Stamps and/or food pantries have an effect on (a) whether the household perceives food shortages and (b) whether a child's physical well-being is being compromised by a lack of food. The research uses data collected by the Food Distribution Research Project, which in 1993 surveyed 405 households below 185% of the poverty level in Allegheny County, PA. The research shows a preference among the nonelderly for the Food Stamp program over food pantries. Conversely, elderly households tend to use the food pantry system over the Food Stamp program.
机译:提出的研究调查了食品券与食品储藏室在缓解贫困家庭中食品短缺方面的作用。首先,使用多项式合法模型来研究哪些因素影响贫困家庭做出的四种替代性食品援助选择:(a)使用食品券,(b)使用食品储藏室(c)使用两个程序,或(d)都不使用任何程序。其次,通过使用二项式概率模型研究了食品储藏室和食品券在缓解食品短缺方面的功效,该模型估计了使用食品储藏券和/或食品储藏室是否对(a)家庭是否感知到食品短缺和(b)食物不足是否会损害儿童的身体健康。该研究使用的是食品分配研究项目(Food Distribution Research Project)收集的数据,该项目于1993年对宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县(Allegheny County)贫困水平低于185%的405户家庭进行了调查。研究表明,在非老年人中,食品券计划比食品储藏室更受青睐。相反,老年家庭倾向于在食品券计划中使用食品储藏系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号