首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior >Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served.
【24h】

Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served.

机译:上菜碗的选择会使上菜的食物数量产生偏差。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation. Methods: In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity). Results: Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77% more pasta (364.0 vs 205.5 g; P<.01) and felt more satiated ( P=.03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P>.32). Conclusions and Implications: In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.
机译:目的:确定容纳多人食物的普通食用碗如何影响食用行为和食用,以及它们是否独立于饱食和食物评估。方法:在受试者之间的实验中,将68名参与者从大碗(6.9升容量)或中型碗(3.8升容量)中随机分配到一个面食组中。结果:协方差分析表明,与大碗相比,大碗时,食客的通心粉含量增加了77%(364.0对205.5克; P <.01),并且饱腹感(P = .03)即使食物没有被评为更美味或更不值得注意(所有P> .32)。结论与启示:与那些涉及较大盘子和勺子的研究相反,使用大碗的人感到更加满足。这些发现再次凸显了外部线索在食物消费中的作用,并表明了在营养教育中考虑食用碗大小的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号