...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinics in liver disease >Appendix: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Management of Hepatitis C 2002.
【24h】

Appendix: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Management of Hepatitis C 2002.

机译:附录:美国国立卫生研究院共识研究会议,丙型肝炎管理,2002年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C infection has diminished in the United States. This decline is largely because of a decrease in cases among IDUs for reasons that are unclear and, to a lesser extent, to testing of blood donors for HCV. The virus is transmitted by blood, and such transmission now occurs primarily through injection drug use, sex with an infected partner or multiple partners, and occupational exposure. Most infections become chronic, and therefore the prevalence of HCV infections is high, with about 3 million Americans estimated, to be chronically infected. HCV is a leading cause of cirrhosis, a common cause of HCC and the leading cause of liter transplantation in the United States. The disease spectrum associated with HCV infection varies greatly. Various studies have suggested that 3% to 10% of chronically infected patients will develop cirrhosis over a 20-year period, and these patients are at risk for HCC. Persons who are older at the time of infection, patients with continuous exposure to alcohol, and those coinfected with HIV or HBV demonstrate accelerated progression to more advanced liver disease. Conversely, individuals infected at a younger age have little or no disease progression over several decades. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection often is suggested by abnormalities in ALT levels and is established by EIA followed by confirmatory determination of HCV RNA. Several sensitive and specific assays are automated partly for the purposes of detecting HCV RNA and quantifying the viral level. Although there is little correlation between viral level and disease manifestations, these assays have proven useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment and, particularly, in demonstrating successful response to treatment as defined by an SVR. Liver biopsy is useful in defining baseline abnormalities of liver disease and in enabling patients and healthcare providers to reach a decision regarding antiviral therapy. Noninvasive tests do not provide the information that can be obtained through liver biopsy. Information on the genotype of the virus is important to guide treatment decisions. Genotype 1, most commonly found in the United States, is less amenable to treatment than genotypes 2 or 3. Therefore, clinical trials of antiviral therapies require genotyping information for appropriate stratification of subjects. Recent therapeutic trials in defined, selected populations have shown clearly that combinations of interferons and ribavirin are more effective than monotherapy. Moreover, trials using pegylated interferons have yielded improved SVR rates with similar toxicity profiles. Results continue to show, however, that the SVR rate is less common in patients with genotype 1 infections, higher HCV RNA levels, or more advanced stages of fibrosis. Genotype 1 infections require therapy for 48 weeks, whereas shorter treatment is feasible in genotype 2 and 3 infections. In genotype 1, the lack of an early virologic response (< 2 log decrease in HCV RNA) is associated with failure to achieve an SVR. The SVR is lower in patients with advanced liver disease than in patients without cirrhosis. Ongoing trials are exploring the usefulness of combination therapy in various populations. Preliminary experience in IDUs, individuals coinfected with HIV, children, and other special groups suggests similar responses are achievable in these populations. Patients with acute hepatitis C may be treated, but specific recommendations for antiviral treatment must await further evaluation of the rate of spontaneous clearance of the virus and determination of the optimal time to initiate treatment. Preventive measures beyond blood-banking practices include prompt identification of infected individuals, awareness of the potential for perinatal transmission, implementation of safe injection practices, linkage of drug users to drug treatment programs. and implementation of community-bas
机译:在美国,新发的丙型肝炎感染的发生率有所下降。下降的主要原因是注射吸毒者中的病例有所减少,原因尚不明确,其次是对献血者进行HCV检测。病毒是通过血液传播的,这种传播现在主要通过注射毒品的使用,与被感染的伴侣或多个伴侣的性行为以及职业暴露而发生。大多数感染会变成慢性感染,因此HCV感染的患病率很高,据估计约有300万美国人被慢性感染。在美国,HCV是肝硬化的主要病因,是肝癌的常见病因,也是公升移植的主要病因。与HCV感染有关的疾病谱差异很大。各种研究表明,在20年内,将有3%至10%的慢性感染患者发展为肝硬化,并且这些患者有患HCC的危险。感染时年龄较大的人,持续饮酒的患者以及合并感染HIV或HBV的患者表现出加速发展为晚期肝病的趋势。相反,在几十年中,年纪较小的感染者几乎没有疾病进展。慢性丙型肝炎感染的诊断通常是由ALT水平异常提示的,并由EIA建立并随后确定性测定HCV RNA。为了检测HCV RNA和定量病毒水平,部分灵敏且特异的测定部分实现了自动化。尽管病毒水平和疾病表现之间几乎没有相关性,但是这些测定方法已被证明可用于识别更可能受益于治疗的患者,尤其是证明对SVR定义的治疗有成功的反应。肝活检可用于确定肝脏疾病的基线异常,并使患者和医疗保健提供者能够就抗病毒治疗做出决定。非侵入性测试不能提供可通过肝活检获得的信息。有关病毒基因型的信息对于指导治疗决策很重要。基因型1(最常见于美国)比基因型2或3更难接受治疗。因此,抗病毒疗法的临床试验需要基因分型信息以对受试者进行适当的分层。最近在确定的,选定的人群中进行的治疗试验清楚地表明,干扰素和利巴韦林的组合比单一疗法更有效。此外,使用聚乙二醇化干扰素的试验已提高了SVR率,且毒性相似。然而,结果继续显示,在基因型1感染,HCV RNA水平较高或纤维化晚期的患者中,SVR率较不常见。基因型1感染需要治疗48周,而基因型2和3感染更短的治疗是可行的。在基因型1中,缺乏早期病毒学应答(HCV RNA下降<2 log)与无法实现SVR有关。晚期肝病患者的SVR低于无肝硬化患者。正在进行的试验正在探索各种人群中联合治疗的有效性。在注射毒品使用者,合并感染艾滋病毒的儿童,儿童以及其他特殊人群的初步经验表明,在这些人群中可以实现类似的反应。可以治疗急性丙型肝炎患者,但是必须等待抗病毒治疗的具体建议,以进一步评估病毒的自发清除率并确定开始治疗的最佳时间。除采取血库措施外,预防措施还包括迅速识别受感染的个人,了解围产期传播的可能性,实施安全注射措施,将吸毒者与药物治疗计划联系起来。社区的设计与实施

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号