首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management >RECENT EVIDENCE ON THE BROAD BENEFITS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH POLICY
【24h】

RECENT EVIDENCE ON THE BROAD BENEFITS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH POLICY

机译:生殖健康政策的广泛利益的最新证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abortion policy has been a hot-button issue since the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade in 1973. In the last decade, the controversy surrounding abortion has widened to include contraception (Shorto, 2006). Many anti-abortion groups have broadened their challenge of Roe v. Wade to the earlier 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut decision, which declared states' regulation of private matters (like the use of contraception) unconstitutional. Proposals to reduce public funding or remove regulations that ensure women's access to contraception have become increasingly explicit in policy discussions. In 2011 and 2012, a caucus of conservative House Republicans proposed defunding Title X of the Public Health Service Act, which supports family planning providers that serve close to 5 million women (Cohen, 2011). Highlighting the recent controversy, the 2010 Affordable Care Act's requirement that contraception be covered free of charge by employer-provided health insurance has spurred over 40 lawsuits nationwide (Barnes, 2013).
机译:自1973年美国最高法院裁定Roe诉Wade案以来,堕胎政策一直是一个紧迫的问题。在过去十年中,围绕堕胎的争议已扩大到包括避孕在内(Shorto,2006年)。许多反堕胎团体将对Roe诉Wade的质疑扩大到1965年Griswold诉康涅狄格州的较早判决,该判决宣布各州对私人事务(如使用避孕药具)的管理违宪。在政策讨论中,减少公共资金或废除确保妇女获得避孕措施的法规的提案已变得越来越明确。在2011年和2012年,保守党众议院共和党人提议将《公共卫生服务法》第X篇标题中的资金削减,以支持为近500万妇女提供服务的计划生育提供者(Cohen,2011)。作为近期争议的焦点,2010年《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)要求由雇主提供的健康保险免费提供避孕措施的要求在全国范围内激起了40多次诉讼(Barnes,2013)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号