首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Reanalysis and perspective in the heat-aggression debate
【24h】

Reanalysis and perspective in the heat-aggression debate

机译:在热侵略辩论中的重新分析和观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

B. J. Bushman, M. C. Wang, and C. A. Anderson (2005) argued that a reanalysis of E. G. Cohn and J. Rotton's (1997) Minneapolis data shows no inverted-U curvilinear relationship between temperature and aggression. Although B. J. Bushman et al.'s (2005) claim of no general inverted-U trend in the data might well be supported statistically, more careful examination of the subset of the data most likely to include the hottest temperatures in the study may offer at least some support for the inverted-U relationship. Aggregating data to describe a general trend minimizes the influence of outliers that may reflect alternative relationships, and such alternatives may be important practically and theoretically.
机译:B. J. Bushman,M。C. Wang和C. A. Anderson(2005)认为,对E. G. Cohn和J. Rotton(1997)的明尼阿波利斯数据进行的重新分析显示,温度和侵略性之间没有倒U曲线关系。尽管BJ Bushman等人(2005)声称在数据上没有普遍的倒U趋势可能得到统计学上的支持,但更仔细地检查最有可能包括该研究中最热温度的数据子集可能是至少对倒U型关系有一些支持。汇总数据以描述总体趋势可以最大程度地减少可能反映替代关系的异常值的影响,并且这种替代在实践和理论上都可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号