...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Similar effect of therapeutic ultrasound and antibiotics for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: a randomised trial
【24h】

Similar effect of therapeutic ultrasound and antibiotics for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: a randomised trial

机译:超声治疗和抗生素对急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的相似作用:一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Question: Is there any difference between the effect of therapeutic ultrasound and antibiotics (amoxicillin) on pain and congestion for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in the short-term? Is there any difference in patient satisfaction, preferred future intervention, side-effects and relapses in the long-term? Design: A randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: 48 patients (6 dropouts) with clinically diagnosed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in primary care. Intervention: The experimental group received 4 consecutive days of ultrasound and the control group received a 10-day course of antibiotics. Outcome measures: Pain and congestion around the nose and in the forehead and teeth were measured on a 0-10 numeric rating scale at baseline, Day 4, and Day 21. Satisfaction, preferred future intervention, side-effects, and relapses were measured one year later. Results: By Day 4, pain around the nose had decreased by 1.5 points out of 10 (95% Cl 0.6 to 2.5) more in the experimental group than the control group. There were no other differences in decrease in pain and congestion between the groups at Day 4 or 21. At one year follow-up, the experimental group were more likely to prefer ultrasound than the control group were to prefer antibiotics to manage a future episode (RR 2.75, 95% Cl 1.19 to 7.91). There were no other differences between the groups in terms of satisfaction with intervention, number of side-effects, or number of relapses. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that therapeutic ultrasound is a viable alternative to antibiotics in the management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Trial registration: NCT00934830.
机译:问题:短期内,治疗性超声波和抗生素(阿莫西林)对急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的疼痛和充血有什么区别?长期而言,患者满意度,首选的未来干预措施,副作用和复发之间是否存在差异?设计:具有隐藏分配和意向性治疗分析的随机试验。参加者:初级保健中有48例临床诊断为急性细菌性鼻鼻窦炎的患者(6例辍学)。干预:实验组连续4天接受超声检查,对照组接受10天疗程的抗生素治疗。结果测量:在基线,第4天和第21天,以0-10的数字量表对鼻子周围,额头和牙齿的疼痛和充血进行测量。对满意度,首选的未来干预措施,副作用和复发进行了测量1一年后。结果:到第4天,实验组的鼻子周围疼痛比对照组减少了1.5点(95%Cl为0.6至2.5),增加了10点。在第4天或第21天,两组之间疼痛和充血的减轻没有其他差异。在一年的随访中,实验组更喜欢超声检查,而对照组更喜欢使用抗生素来控制将来的发作( RR 2.75,95%Cl 1.19至7.91)。两组之间在干预满意度,副作用数量或复发次数方面没有其他差异。结论:这项研究的结果表明,在急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎的治疗中,治疗性超声可以替代抗生素。试用注册:NCT00934830。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号