首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric psychology >Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to promote treatment adherence in children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic illness
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to promote treatment adherence in children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic illness

机译:心理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析,以促进儿童,青少年和慢性病青年的依从性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of recent adherence-promoting interventions for youth with chronic health conditions. Methods: Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials of adherencepromoting interventions for youth with a chronic illness published between 2007 and 2013 (n=23) were reviewed. Intervention delivery (in-person vs. technology-based) and outcome measurement (e.g., self-report) were examined as potential moderators of treatment effects. Results: Mean effect sizes were small at posttreatment (d=0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08, 0.31, n=23) and follow-up (d=0.29, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.43, n=9). Intervention delivery and outcome measurement did not account for variation in treatment effects (p>.05). Conclusions: The small treatment effects of recent adherence-promoting intervention (APIs) reflect the methodological limitations of the included studies and the need to reexamine the delivery and mechanisms of adherence-promoting interventions.
机译:目的:这项荟萃分析检查了近期促进依从性干预措施对慢性病青年的有效性。方法:回顾了2007年至2013年间发表的对患有慢性病的青年进行依从性促进干预措施的同行评审随机对照试验(n = 23)。检查了干预措施的交付(面对面还是基于技术)和结果测量(例如自我报告)作为治疗效果的潜在调节因素。结果:在治疗后(d = 0.20,95%置信区间(CI):0.08,0.31,n = 23)和随访(d = 0.29,95%CI:0.15,0.43,n = 9)时,平均效应大小较小)。干预措施的交付和结果的测量并未考虑治疗效果的差异(p> .05)。结论:最近的依从性干预措施(API)的微小治疗效果反映了所纳入研究的方法学局限性,并且需要重新检查依从性干预措施的实施和机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号