...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics >Combined femoral and pelvic osteotomies versus femoral osteotomy alone in the treatment of hip dysplasia in children with cerebral palsy.
【24h】

Combined femoral and pelvic osteotomies versus femoral osteotomy alone in the treatment of hip dysplasia in children with cerebral palsy.

机译:股骨和骨盆联合截骨术与单独股骨截骨术治疗脑瘫患儿髋关节发育不良。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: Although evidence is increasing that the most effective treatment for the severely subluxated or dislocated hips is a one-stage comprehensive approach there are few studies that compare the results with the traditional approach (varus derotational osteotomy, VDRO). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcome after one-stage reconstruction versus VDRO alone. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 hips in 39 consecutive patients with spastic cerebral palsy treated from January 1997 to January 2007. Group A (36 hips) was treated with a VDRO and San Diego osteotomy and group B (16 hips) with VDRO alone. Mean age was 8.1+/-3.6 years. Mean follow-up was 4.4 years. Evaluation was performed according to clinical criteria (hip range of motion, pain, and sitting comfort) and radiographic parameters [center-edge angle, acetabular index, neckshaft angle, and Reimer's Index (MI)]. RESULTS: There were no delayed unions, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or postoperative infections in either group. There was significant decrease in pain and improvement of the center-edge angle and acetabular index in the combined approach. Of the patients who had VDRO alone 25% needed revision procedures and none of the combined group needed other procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiologic results obtained by the one-stage procedure were far better than doing VDRO alone justifying a more extensive approach. Consideration should be given to performing the combined procedure in cerebral palsy patients with hip subluxation or dislocation.
机译:目的:尽管越来越多的证据表明,对于严重半脱位或脱位的髋关节最有效的治疗方法是一阶段综合治疗,但很少有研究将结果与传统方法(内翻截骨术,VDRO)进行比较。这项研究的目的是评估一阶段重建与单纯VDRO相比的临床和放射学结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了1997年1月至2007年1月连续治疗的39例痉挛性脑瘫患者的52髋。A组(36髋)接受了VDRO和San Diego截骨术的治疗,B组(16髋)接受了单独的VDRO的治疗。平均年龄为8.1 +/- 3.6岁。平均随访时间为4.4年。根据临床标准(髋关节运动范围,疼痛和坐着舒适度)和射线照相参数[中心边缘角,髋臼指数,颈轴角和Reimer指数(MI)]进行评估。结果:两组均无延迟愈合,股骨头缺血性坏死或术后感染。联合治疗可明显减轻疼痛,改善中心边缘角度和髋臼指数。仅接受VDRO的患者中,有25%的患者需要修订程序,而合并组中没有一个需要其他程序。结论:通过一步法获得的临床和放射学结果远胜于单独进行VDRO,证明了更广泛的方法是正确的。对于合并髋关节半脱位或脱位的脑瘫患者,应考虑进行联合手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号