...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >Is bruxism severity a predictor of oral splint efficacy in patients with myofascial face pain?
【24h】

Is bruxism severity a predictor of oral splint efficacy in patients with myofascial face pain?

机译:磨牙症严重程度是肌筋膜性面部疼痛患者口腔夹板疗效的预测指标吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Both the efficacy and mechanism of any effect of oral splint therapy for patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a matter of controversy. To address these issues, this study tested the hypothesis that oral splints produce the most marked pain relief for those TMD patients with myofascial face pain (MFP) who also brux (i.e. grind or clench) more than other MFP patients. In a 6-week randomized controlled clinical trial, 52 women with MFP were randomly assigned to receive either a full-coverage hard acrylic splint or a palatal-only splint. Bruxism was assessed both by self-report and by an objective assessment of molar microwear changes over a 2-week period prior to the start of the trial. Tested across multiple outcome measures, results indicated that those receiving the full-coverage splint had marginally better improvement on some pain-related measures than those receiving the palatal splint, but severity of bruxism did not moderate the therapeutic effect of the full-coverage splint. Thesefindings strongly argue against the belief that oral splints reduce MFP by reducing bruxism and raise questions about the importance of bruxism in the maintenance of MFP.
机译:口腔夹板疗法对颞下颌疾病(TMD)患者的疗效和任何作用机制均存在争议。为了解决这些问题,本研究检验了以下假设,即对于那些肌筋膜面痛(MFP)的TMD患者,口齿夹板能够产生最明显的疼痛缓解,而这些患者也比其他MFP患者更多地红肿(即磨伤或紧握)。在为期6周的随机对照临床试验中,随机分配52名MFP妇女接受全覆盖硬质丙烯酸夹板或仅pa板夹板。在试验开始前的两周内,通过自我报告和对磨牙微磨损变化的客观评估来评估磨牙症。通过对多种结局指标的测试,结果表明,采用全覆盖夹板的患者在某些与疼痛相关的措施方面比采用pa骨夹板的患者略有改善,但磨牙症的严重程度并未减缓全覆盖夹板的治疗效果。这些发现强烈反对这样的观点,即口腔夹板通过减少磨牙症减少了MFP,并提出了关于磨牙症在维持MFP中的重要性的疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号