首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic science : >Outcomes and complications of fractures of distal radius (AO type B and C): Volar plating versus nonoperative treatment
【24h】

Outcomes and complications of fractures of distal radius (AO type B and C): Volar plating versus nonoperative treatment

机译:远端radius骨骨折的结果和并发症(AO B型和C型):掌侧钢板与非手术治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Management of AO type B and C fractures of the distal radius is controversial. This study compares outcomes and complications of AO type B and C fractures of the distal radius treated with volar locked plating and nonoperative methods. Materials and methods: Sixty-four patients with fractures of the distal radius (AO type B and C) were included in this study, according to inclusion criteria, and were allocated to the volar plating group or nonoperative group by alternate randomization: 32 patients with odd numbers went into the nonoperative group and the other 32 with even numbers went into the volar plating group. Patients in the nonoperative group were managed with closed reduction of the fracture and plaster cast application under an image intensifier. Those in the volar plating group were managed by open reduction and fixation with a volar locked plate. Preoperative and postoperative serial clinico-radiological follow-up was done. The range of movement, grip strength, functional outcome scores and radiological parameters were compared. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis with significance at p < 0.05. Results: Range of movement and functional scores were significantly (p < 0.001) better in the volar plating group, but the difference in ulnar variance and radial and ulnar deviation was insignificant as compared to the nonoperative group. At 24 months follow-up, the nonoperative group had significantly more cases with malunion, articular incongruity and osteoarthritis. Conclusion: In cases of AO type B or C fractures of the distal radius, volar locked plating provides anatomical stable fixation and early mobilization with better clinico-radiological outcome as compared to conservative treatment.
机译:目的:对radius骨远端B型和C型骨折的治疗存在争议。本研究比较了采用掌侧锁定钢板和非手术方法治疗的radius骨远端B型和C型AO骨折的结果和并发症。材料和方法:根据纳入标准,将64例radius骨远端骨折(AO B型和C型)患者纳入研究,并通过随机分组分配入掌侧钢板组或非手术组:32例奇数进入非手术组,另32个偶数进入掌骨组。非手术组的患者在影像增强器下闭合复位骨折并应用石膏石膏治疗。掌侧钢板组的患者通过切开复位并用掌侧锁定钢板固定。进行了术前和术后的系列临床放射学随访。比较了运动范围,握力,功能评分和影像学参数。学生t检验用于统计学分析,其显着性为p <0.05。结果:掌侧钢板组的运动范围和功能评分明显好于对照组(p <0.001),但与非手术组相比,尺骨方差,radial骨和尺骨偏差的差异不明显。在24个月的随访中,非手术组有畸形畸形,关节不协调和骨关节炎的病例明显更多。结论:对于conservative骨远端B型或C型骨折,与保守治疗相比,掌侧锁定钢板可提供解剖学稳定的固定和早期活动,具有更好的临床放射学结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号