首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy >Impact of constipation on opioid use patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in cancer patients on opioid therapy.
【24h】

Impact of constipation on opioid use patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in cancer patients on opioid therapy.

机译:便秘对阿片类药物治疗的癌症患者的阿片类药物使用方式,医疗资源利用和费用的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patterns of opioid use, resource utilization, and costs in cancer patients with and without constipation were compared using retrospective insurance claims data. Inclusion criteria were > =30 days of opioid use and continuous plan coverage for > or =6 months before and > or =12 months following first opioid claim (index date). Constipation was defined as > or =1 ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes in the range of 564.0x during the 12 months postindex date. Of the 8836 opioid initiators with cancer initially considered, approximately 9.3% (n = 821) had a diagnosis of constipation during follow-up. Opioid use patterns were compared between patients with constipation and matched controls. Two-part semilogarithmic regression models assessed the impact of constipation on resource utilization and associated costs. Compared with controls without constipation, patients with constipation had higher rates of concurrent use of > or =2 opioids (P < .0001), opioid discontinuation (P = .0002), opioid switching (P < .0001), nausea with vomiting (P < .0001), and respiratory depression (P = .0003). Compared with controls, more patients with constipation received inpatient (P < .0001), hospice (P = .0086), home health (P < .0001), laboratory (P = .0015), other outpatient (P < .0001), emergency (P < .0001), office visit (P < .0001), and nursing home care (P = .0266). Compared with controls, patients with constipation had substantially higher total costs (P < .0001). This study suggests that in opioid-treated cancer patients, constipation significantly impacts opioid-use patterns, resource utilization, and costs. Alleviation of constipation may optimize opioid therapy and reduce costs.
机译:使用回顾性保险索赔数据比较了患有和不伴便秘的癌症患者中阿片类药物的使用,资源利用和费用的模式。入选标准为:≥30天的阿片类药物使用和连续计划覆盖期,≥第一个阿片类药物声明前的>或= 6个月,以及在首次类鸦片药物声明后的>或= 12个月(索引日期)。在索引后的12个月内,便秘定义为大于或等于ICD-9-CM诊断代码,范围为564.0x。最初考虑的8836名阿片类药物引发者中,有9.3%(n = 821)在随访期间被诊断为便秘。在便秘患者和相匹配的对照组之间比较了阿片类药物的使用方式。由两部分组成的半对数回归模型评估了便秘对资源利用和相关成本的影响。与没有便秘的对照组相比,有便秘的患者同时使用>或= 2阿片类药物(P <.0001),阿片类药物停药(P = .0002),阿片类药物转换(P <.0001),呕吐恶心(更高)的发生率更高。 P <.0001)和呼吸抑制(P = .0003)。与对照组相比,更多的便秘患者接受住院治疗(P <.0001),临终关怀(P = .0086),家庭保健(P <.0001),实验室(P = .0015),其他门诊患者(P <.0001) ,紧急情况(P <.0001),办公室就诊(P <.0001)和养老院护理(P = .0266)。与对照组相比,便秘患者的总费用要高得多(P <.0001)。这项研究表明,在阿片类药物治疗的癌症患者中,便秘会显着影响阿片类药物的使用方式,资源利用和成本。缓解便秘可以优化阿片类药物治疗并降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号