...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Randomized controlled trial of the Alexander technique for idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial of the Alexander technique for idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

机译:亚历山大技术治疗特发性帕金森氏病的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Alexander Technique, alongside normal treatment, is of benefit to people disabled by idiopathic Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with three groups, one receiving lessons in the Alexander Technique, another receiving massage and one with no additional intervention. Measures were taken pre- and post-intervention, and at follow-up, six months later. SETTING: The Polyclinic at the University of Westminster, Central London. SUBJECTS: Ninety-three people with clinically confirmed idiopathic Parkinson's disease. INTERVENTIONS: The Alexander Technique group received 24 lessons in the Alexander Technique and the massage group received 24 sessions of massage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the Self-assessment Parkinson's Disease Disability Scale (SPDDS) at best and at worst times of day. Secondary measures included the Beck Depression Inventory and an Attitudes to Self Scale. RESULTS: The Alexander Technique group improved compared with the no additional intervention group, pre-intervention to post-intervention, both on the SPDDS at best, p = 0.04 (confidence interval (CI) -6.4 to 0.0) and on the SPDDS at worst, p = 0.01 (CI -11.5 to -1.8). The comparative improvement was maintained at six-month follow-up: on the SPDDS at best, p = 0.04 (CI -7.7 to 0.0) and on the SPDDS at worst, p = 0.01 (CI -11.8 to -0.9). The Alexander Technique group was comparatively less depressed post-intervention, p = 0.03 (CI -3.8 to 0.0) on the Beck Depression Inventory, and at six-month follow-up had improved on the Attitudes to Self Scale, p = 0.04 (CI -13.9 to 0.0). CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that lessons in the Alexander Technique are likely to lead to sustained benefit for people with Parkinson's disease.
机译:目的:确定亚历山大技术与常规治疗方法是否对因特发性帕金森病致残的人是否有益。设计:一项随机对照试验,分为三组,一组接受亚历山大技术的课程,另一组接受按摩,另一组无需额外干预。干预前后均采取了措施,六个月后进行了随访。地点:伦敦市中心威斯敏斯特大学的综合诊所。受试者:九十三名临床确诊为特发性帕金森氏病的人。干预措施:亚历山大技术组在亚历山大技术中接受了24节课,按摩组接受了24次按摩。主要观察指标:主要观察指标是一天中最好,最差时间的帕金森氏病残疾自评量表(SPDDS)。次要措施包括贝克抑郁量表和自评量表。结果:与无其他干预组相比,亚历山大技术组在SPDDS最佳时,p = 0.04(置信区间(CI)-6.4至0.0)和SPDDS最佳时均优于干预前至干预后。 ,p = 0.01(CI -11.5至-1.8)。在六个月的随访中保持了相对的改善:最佳SPDDS时,p = 0.04(CI -7.7至0.0),最差SPDDS时,p = 0.01(CI -11.8至-0.9)。亚历山大技术组的干预后抑郁情绪相对较低,贝克抑郁量表的p = 0.03(CI -3.8至0.0),并且在六个月的随访中,自评量表的态度有所改善,p = 0.04(CI -13.9至0.0)。结论:有证据表明,亚历山大技术的教训可能会为帕金森氏病患者带来持续的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号