...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical psychology review >Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive-compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993-2014
【24h】

Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive-compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993-2014

机译:强迫症的认知行为治疗。 1993-2014年发表的研究的系统综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is ranked by the WHO as among the 10 most debilitating disorders and tends to be chronic without adequate treatment. The only psychological treatment that has been found effective is cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). This meta-analysis includes all RCTs (N = 37) of CBT for OCD using the interview-based Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, published 1993 to 2014. The effect sizes for comparisons of CBT with waiting-list (1.31), and placebo conditions (1.33) were very large, whereas those for comparisons between individual and group treatment (0.17), and exposure and response prevention vs. cognitive therapy (0.07) were small and non-significant. CBT was significantly better than antidepressant medication (0.55), but the combination of CBT and medication was not significantly better than CBT plus placebo (0.25). The RCTs have a number of methodological problems and recommendations for improving the methodological rigor are discussed as well as clinical implications of the findings. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:强迫症被世界卫生组织列为十大最使人衰弱的疾病,如果没有适当的治疗,往往是慢性的。被发现有效的唯一心理治疗是认知行为疗法(CBT)。这项荟萃分析使用1993年至2014年发布的基于访谈的耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表,包括了强迫症所用CBT的所有RCT(N = 37)。比较CBT与候补名单(1.31)和安慰剂的影响大小病情(1.33)非常大,而用于个体治疗和小组治疗的比较(0.17)以及暴露和反应预防与认知治疗的比较(0.07)很小且没有意义。 CBT明显优于抗抑郁药(0.55),但CBT和药物的联合使用并不明显优于CBT加安慰剂(0.25)。 RCT存在许多方法学问题,并讨论了改善方法严谨性的建议以及研究结果的临床意义。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号