首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine >Is an occupational examination superior to an occupational health history alone for preplacement screening in health care settings?
【24h】

Is an occupational examination superior to an occupational health history alone for preplacement screening in health care settings?

机译:在卫生保健场所进行职业前检查时,职业检查是否仅优于职业健康史?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To determine whether preplacement recommendations following an occupationally focused medical history is different from those following an occupational consultation. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 172 applicants to our institution. Results: Following provider review of occupational history survey alone, none of the applicants had restrictions recommended. In comparison, only 163 applicants (94.7%) were recommended to be hired without restrictions following provider review of the same patient's occupational history and examination (P = 0.0078). Conclusion: A well-designed questionnaire is useful for screening applicants for preplacement examinations and assures sufficient detail to allow for a large proportion of individuals to proceed to employment without an occupational examination. However, in this study, a small but statistically significant portion (5%) of applicants required occupational examinations for appropriate work recommendations.
机译:目的:确定职业病史后的安置建议与职业咨询后的安置建议是否不同。方法:这是对我们机构的172名申请人的回顾性队列研究。结果:仅在提供者对职业病历调查进行审查之后,没有一个申请人受到推荐的限制。相比之下,在提供者对同一患者的职业经历和检查进行了审查之后,建议无限制地仅推荐163名申请人(94.7%)进行雇用(P = 0.0078)。结论:精心设计的问卷对于筛选申请人进行岗前考试非常有用,并且可以确保足够的详细信息,使大部分人无需职业检查就可以就业。但是,在这项研究中,一小部分但具有统计学意义的申请人(5%)需要进行职业检查才能获得适当的工作建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号