首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy
【24h】

Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy

机译:Pipelle取样器与传统子宫内膜活检的常规刮宫刮除术(D&C)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy and adequacy of the Pipelle endometrial sampler for endometrial biopsy as compared with those of conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C). A total of 245 patients subject to endometrial biopsy were included in this study. We have shown that the failure rates with D&C and Pipelle were 7.75% and 8.98%, respectively, without statistical difference. Additionally, the obtained specimen quality and accurate diagnosis of various diseases using the two methods had no significant statistical differences. Furthermore, patients experienced less pain when Pipelle sampler was used than D&C. Therefore, Pipelle sampler is effective in obtaining adequate endometrial tissue for histodiagnosis, and is applicable in most of the cases for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究与传统的扩张刮除术(D&C)相比,Piper子宫内膜取样器进行子宫内膜活检的准确性和充分性。本研究共纳入245例接受子宫内膜活检的患者。我们发现,D&C和Pipelle的故障率分别为7.75%和8.98%,无统计学差异。此外,使用两种方法获得的标本质量和对各种疾病的准确诊断均无显着统计学差异。此外,使用Pipelle采样器比使用D&C减轻了患者的痛苦。因此,Pipelle采样器可有效获取足够的子宫内膜组织以进行组织学诊断,并且适用于大多数情况下的中国子宫内膜活检。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号