...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS neuroscience & therapeutics >Biomarkers for the clinical differential diagnosis in traumatic brain injury-A systematic review
【24h】

Biomarkers for the clinical differential diagnosis in traumatic brain injury-A systematic review

机译:用于脑外伤临床鉴别诊断的生物标志物-系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rapid triage and decision-making in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) present challenging dilemma in "resource poor" environments such as the battlefield and developing areas of the world. There is an urgent need for additional tools to guide treatment of TBI. The aim of this review is to establish the possible use of diagnostic TBI biomarkers in (1) identifying diffuse and focal brain injury and (2) assess their potential for determining outcome, intracranial pressure (ICP), and responses to therapy. At present, there is insufficient literature to support a role for diagnostic biomarkers in distinguishing focal and diffuse injury or for accurate determination of raised ICP. Presently, neurofilament (NF), S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) seemed to have the best potential as diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing focal and diffuse injury, whereas C-tau, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100β, GFAP, and spectrin breakdown products (SBDPs) appear to be candidates for ICP reflective biomarkers. With the combinations of different pathophysiology related to each biomarker, a multibiomarker analysis seems to be effective and would likely increase diagnostic accuracy. There is limited research focusing on the differential diagnostic properties of biomarkers in TBI. This fact warrants the need for greater efforts to innovate sensitive and reliable biomarkers. We advocate awareness and inclusion of the differentiation of injury type and ICP elevation in further studies with brain injury biomarkers.
机译:在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的治疗中,快速分类和决策制定在“资源贫乏”的环境中(例如战场和世界上发展中的地区)提出了具有挑战性的难题。迫切需要其他工具来指导TBI的治疗。这篇综述的目的是确定诊断性TBI生物标记物在(1)识别弥漫性和局灶性脑损伤中的可能用途,以及(2)评估其确定结局,颅内压(ICP)和对治疗的反应的潜力。目前,没有足够的文献支持诊断性生物标志物在区分局灶性和弥漫性损伤或准确测定升高的ICP中的作用。目前,神经丝(NF),S100β,神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素羧基末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1)似乎最有可能作为诊断局灶性和弥漫性损伤的生物标志物,而C-tau,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),S100β,GFAP和血影蛋白分解产物(SBDPs)似乎是ICP反射生物标志物的候选物。通过与每种生物标记物相关的不同病理生理学的组合,多生物标记物分析似乎是有效的,并且可能会提高诊断准确性。很少有研究集中在TBI中生物标志物的鉴别诊断特性上。这一事实表明需要加大力度创新敏感和可靠的生物标记。我们提倡在脑损伤生物标记物的进一步研究中认识并包括对损伤类型和ICP升高的区分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号