首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Is laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy more efficient in operative treatment of endometrial cancer?
【24h】

Is laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy more efficient in operative treatment of endometrial cancer?

机译:腹腔镜或腹部子宫切除术与双侧输卵管卵巢切除术在子宫内膜癌的手术治疗中是否更有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the efficiency and safety of 12 laparoscopic and 13 abdominal hysterectomies performed with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in the operative treatment of endometrial cancer. In all patients, the surgery was extended to include pelvic lymphadenectomy, where the histopathological examination confirmed advanced disease greater than IB (according to FIGO). Our work confirms that laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in endometrial cancer is a safe procedure for the patient and it seems to be more effective in lymph node sampling to abdominal surgery (via laparotomy). Moreover, complications are less frequent and severe when the patient is operated via the laparoscopic approach.
机译:我们比较了12例腹腔镜和13例腹部子宫切除术与双侧输卵管卵巢切除术在子宫内膜癌的手术治疗中的效率和安全性。在所有患者中,手术均扩大到盆腔淋巴结清扫术,其中组织病理学检查证实晚期疾病大于IB(根据FIGO)。我们的工作证实,子宫内膜癌腹腔镜子宫切除术与双侧输卵管卵巢切除术对患者而言是安全的操作,并且似乎在进行腹部手术(通过剖腹术)的淋巴结取样中更为有效。此外,当患者通过腹腔镜方法手术时,并发症的发生频率较低且严重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号