...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice: official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners >Incidence, treatment, and consequences of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in the inpatient and outpatient settings
【24h】

Incidence, treatment, and consequences of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in the inpatient and outpatient settings

机译:住院和门诊患者化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率,治疗及后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To examine the incidence, treatment, and consequences of febrile neutropenia across inpatient and outpatient care settings. Methods: Data were obtained from Humedica's National Electronic Health Record-Derived Longitudinal Patient-Level Database (2007-2010). The study population included adult patients who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy for a solid tumor or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. For each patient, each chemotherapy regimen course and each cycle within each regimen course was characterized. Febrile neutropenia episodes were identified on a cycle-specific basis based on any of the following: (1) absolute neutrophil count 1.0×109/L and evidence of infection or fever; (2) inpatient diagnosis of neutropenia, fever, or infection; (3) outpatient diagnosis of neutropenia and non-prophylactic antimicrobial use; or (4) mention of febrile neutropenia in physician notes. Febrile neutropenia episodes were categorized as inpatient or outpatient based on the initial setting of care (i.e. acute-care inpatient facility vs. ambulatory care facility). Febrile neutropenia consequences included hospital length of stay and mortality (inpatient cases only), as well as number of febrile neutropenia-related outpatient encounters. Results: Among the 2131 patients in this study, 401 experienced a total of 458 febrile neutropenia episodes. Risk of febrile neutropenia during the chemotherapy regimen course was 16.8% (95% CI: 15.3, 18.4). In cycle 1 alone, risk of febrile neutropenia was 8.1% (7.1, 9.3). Most febrile neutropenia episodes (83.2%) were initially treated in the inpatient setting; the hospital mortality rate was 8.1% (5.8, 11.1), and mean hospital length of stay was 8.4 days (7.7, 9.1). Among febrile neutropenia episodes initially treated in the outpatient setting (16.8%), the mean number of outpatient management encounters was 2.6 (2.1, 3.1), most of which were in the physician's office (69.2%) or emergency department (26.9%). Conclusions: Febrile neutropenia remains a common occurrence among patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and typically results in extended hospitalization and, for many patients, death. A minority of patients are, however, treated exclusively on an outpatient basis.
机译:目的:探讨在医院和门诊患者中发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率,治疗和后果。方法:数据来自Humedica的国家电子健康记录得出的纵向患者水平数据库(2007-2010年)。研究人群包括因实体瘤或非霍奇金淋巴瘤接受骨髓抑制化疗的成年患者。对于每位患者,每个化疗方案疗程和每个方案疗程中的每个周期都有特征。根据以下任一情况,以周期为基础确定发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作:(1)中性粒细胞绝对计数<1.0×109 / L,有感染或发烧迹象; (2)住院诊断为中性粒细胞减少,发烧或感染; (3)中性粒细胞减少症的门诊诊断和非预防性使用抗菌药物;或(4)在医师记录中提及发热性中性粒细胞减少。根据最初的护理环境(即急诊住院设施与门诊医疗设施),将发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作分为住院或门诊。发热性中性粒细胞减少症的后果包括住院时间和死亡率(仅住院病例),以及发热性中性粒细胞减少症相关的门诊次数。结果:在该研究的2131例患者中,有401例经历了458例发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作。在化疗方案过程中发烧性中性粒细胞减少的风险为16.8%(95%CI:15.3,18.4)。仅在第一个周期中,发热性中性粒细胞减少症的风险为8.1%(7.1,9.3)。大多数发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作(83.2%)最初是在住院患者中进行的;医院死亡率为8.1%(5.8,11.1),平均住院时间为8.4天(7.7,9.1)。在门诊患者中最初治疗的发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作(16.8%)中,门诊处理的平均次数为2.6(2.1,3.1),其中大多数在医师办公室(69.2%)或急诊室(26.9%)。结论:发热性中性粒细胞减少症在接受骨髓抑制性化疗的患者中仍然很普遍,通常会导致住院时间延长,并且对许多患者而言会导致死亡。但是,少数患者仅在门诊治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号