首页> 外文期刊>Journal of opioid management >Analgesic efficacy of intravenous naloxone for the treatment of postoperative pruritus: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Analgesic efficacy of intravenous naloxone for the treatment of postoperative pruritus: a meta-analysis.

机译:静脉内纳洛酮治疗术后瘙痒的镇痛效果:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Pruritus may be a significant problem for patients in the postoperative period. There are many options for the treatment of pruritus including intravenous (IV) naloxone. However, it is not clear whether the use of IV naloxone may also affect analgesia or other opioid-related side effects. The authors have performed a systematic review to further examine this issue. METHODS: Systematic literature searches of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed and EMBASE databases were conducted using terms related to postoperative use of IV naloxone. Only randomized controlled trials comparing IV naloxone used either as a continuous infusion or part of an IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) regimen after surgical procedures were considered. The data on pertinent study characteristics and relevant outcomes were extracted from accepted articles. There was no restriction on language for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 4.2.10 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2004). A random effects model was used. RESULTS: The literature searches yielded eight articles that met all inclusion criteria. There were a total of 424 subjects in the naloxone group and 376 in the saline group. The authors found that the use of naloxone was associated with a decreased risk for pruritus (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.79, p = 0.006] and nausea [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.43-0.89, p = 0.009]. However, the use of IV naloxone (vs no naloxone) did not significantly influence the risk of postoperative emesis [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.70-1.33, p = 0.83], opioid consumption [OR = 0.29, 95% CI = -3.54-4.13, p = 0.88], or sedation [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.38-1.74, p = 0.60]. Finally, the use of IV naloxone did not appear to be associated with any significant change in visual analog score pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively (weighted mean difference = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.50-0.23, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled analysis examining the analgesic efficacy of IV naloxone (either as a continuous infusion or IV PCA) revealed that naloxone was associated with a decrease in pruritus and nausea without any increase in pain scores. When compared with controls, the use of IV naloxone was not associated with any significant changes in opioid consumption or with the risk of sedation or emesis.
机译:目的:瘙痒可能是术后患者的重要问题。有多种治疗瘙痒的选择,包括静脉内(IV)纳洛酮。然而,尚不清楚使用静脉内纳洛酮是否还会影响镇痛或其他与阿片类药物相关的副作用。作者进行了系统的审查,以进一步研究该问题。方法:使用与术后纳洛酮静脉使用相关的术语对美国国立医学图书馆PubMed和EMBASE数据库进行系统文献检索。仅考虑比较在外科手术后静脉内注射纳洛酮或静脉内患者自控镇痛(PCA)方案的一部分进行比较的随机对照试验。有关研究特征和相关结果的数据摘自已接受的文章。收录语言没有限制。使用Review Manager 4.2.10(Cochrane协作,2004年)进行荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型。结果:文献搜索产生了八篇符合所有纳入标准的文章。纳洛酮组共有424名受试者,盐水组共有376名受试者。作者发现,纳洛酮的使用可降低瘙痒的风险(几率[OR] = 0.40,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.21-0.79,p = 0.006]和恶心[OR = 0.62,95% CI = 0.43-0.89,p = 0.009]。但是,静脉使用纳洛酮(无纳洛酮)对术后呕吐的风险没有显着影响[OR = 0.97,95%CI = 0.70-1.33,p = 0.83],阿片类药物的消费[OR = 0.29,95%CI = -3.54-4.13,p = 0.88]或镇静[OR = 0.82,95%CI = 0.38-1.74,p = 0.60]。最后,静脉使用纳洛酮并没有似乎与术后24小时视觉模拟评分疼痛评分的任何重大变化有关(加权平均差异= -0.14,95%CI = -0.50-0.23,p = 0.46)。结论:我们的综合分析研究了镇痛药的镇痛效果IV纳洛酮(连续输注或IV PCA)显示纳洛酮与瘙痒和恶心的减少相关,而疼痛评分没有任何增加。 f IV纳洛酮与阿片类药物消费量的任何重大变化或镇静或呕吐的风险无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号