...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of opioid management >Physician management of moderate-to-severe acute pain: Results from the Physicians Partnering Against Pain (P3) study
【24h】

Physician management of moderate-to-severe acute pain: Results from the Physicians Partnering Against Pain (P3) study

机译:中度至重度急性疼痛的内科治疗:内科医师对疼痛的合作研究(P3)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate differences among physician specialties in the management of acute pain including prescribing practices and management of opioid-related side effects. Design and participants: The Physicians Partnering Against Pain (P3) survey was a nationwide study of US physicians and their patients with severe to moderate acute pain (3 months). Main measures: Physicians were surveyed about volume of patients with moderate-to-severe acute pain in their practice, frequency of prescribing opioid analgesics, percentage of these patients returning for a follow-up visit after treatment, reasons patients discontinue treatment, frequency of recommending or prescribing treatment for opioid-related gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, and frequency of patients taking opioid analgesics that take additional treatments to manage GI side effects. Results: The 5,982 participating physicians represented primary care physicians (PCPs; 52 percent), pain specialists (25 percent), and other specialists (23 percent). PCPs and other specialists were less likely than pain specialists to prescribe opioid analgesics to patients (25.8 percent, 29.5 percent, and 44.8 percent, respectively). The vast majority of pain specialists (78 percent) also indicated that more than three quarters of their patients returned for a follow-up visit compared with only 40 percent of PCPs and 65 percent of other specialists. When ranking the reasons why they think patients discontinue opioid analgesics, pain specialists ranked unacceptable side effects higher than PCPs and other specialists. PCPs and pain specialists were more likely than other specialists to recommend or prescribe treatments to manage opioid-related side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation (38.3 percent, 38.5 percent, and 23.1 percent, respectively). Conclusion: The P 3 Study confirms the challenge of pain management while balancing tolerability of opioid treatments from the physician perspective.
机译:目的:评估医师在治疗急性疼痛方面的差异,包括处方方法和阿片类药物相关副作用的管理。设计与参与者:“医师对抗疼痛”(P3)调查是一项针对美国医师及其严重或中度急性疼痛(<3个月)的患者的全国性研究。主要指标:对医生进行了以下调查:在实践中患有中度至重度急性疼痛的患者数量,开具阿片类镇痛药的频率,这些患者在治疗后返回随访的百分比,患者中止治疗的原因,推荐频率或开具阿片类药物相关胃肠道(GI)副作用的处方药,以及服用阿片类镇痛药并采取其他治疗措施来管理GI副作用的患者的频率。结果:5,982名参与的医生代表了初级保健医生(PCP; 52%),疼痛专家(25%)和其他专家(23%)。与疼痛专家相比,PCP和其他专家不太可能为患者开出阿片类镇痛药(分别为25.8%,29.5%和44.8%)。绝大多数疼痛专家(78%)还表示,他们的患者中有四分之三以上都接受了随访,而PCPs仅为40%,其他专家为65%。当对他们认为患者停止使用阿片类镇痛药的原因进行排名时,疼痛专家将不可接受的副作用列为高于PCP和其他专家。 PCP和疼痛专家比其他专家更有可能推荐或开处方治疗与阿片类药物相关的副作用,例如恶心,呕吐和便秘(分别为38.3%,38.5%和23.1%)。结论:P 3研究证实了从医师的角度来看,在平衡阿片类药物治疗耐受性的同时,疼痛管理面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号