...
首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >Pain management by primary care physicians, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists: a national survey.
【24h】

Pain management by primary care physicians, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists: a national survey.

机译:初级保健医师,疼痛医师,脊医和针灸师的疼痛管理:全国调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is a serious public health problem and is treated by diverse health care providers. In order to enhance policies and programs to improve pain care, we collected information about the distribution of pain patients among four major groups of pain management providers: primary care physicians (PCPs), pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists, and the variation in the attitudes and practices of these providers with respect to some common strategies used for pain. METHODS: National mail survey of PCPs, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists (ntotal = 3,000). RESULTS: Eight hundred seventeen responses were usable (response rate, 29%). Analyses weighted to obtain nationally representative data showed that PCPs treat approximately 52% of chronic pain patients, pain physicians treat 2%, chiropractors treat 40%, and acupuncturists treat 7%. Of the chronic pain patients seen for evaluation, the percentages subsequently treated on an ongoing basis range from 51% (PCPs) to 63% (pain physicians). Pain physicians prescribe long-acting opioids such as methadone, antidepressants or anti-convulsants, and other nontraditional analgesics approximately 50-100% more often than PCPs. Twenty-nine percent of PCPs and 16% of pain physicians reported prescribing opioids less often than they deem appropriate because of regulatory oversight concerns. Of the four groups, PCPs are least likely to feel confident in their ability to manage musculoskeletal pain and neuropathic pain, and are least likely to favor mandatory pain education for all PCPs. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in attitudes and practices of the various disciplines that treat chronic pain. This information may be useful in interpreting differences in patient access to pain care, planning studies to clarify patient outcomes in relation to different providers and treatment strategies, and designing a system that matches chronic pain patients to appropriate practitioners and treatments.
机译:目的:慢性疼痛是一个严重的公共卫生问题,并已由各种医疗保健提供者进行治疗。为了加强旨在改善疼痛护理的政策和计划,我们收集了有关疼痛患者在四个主要组的疼痛管理提供者中分布的信息:初级保健医生(PCP),疼痛医生,脊医和针灸师,以及这些服务提供者对于某些常用疼痛策略的态度和做法。方法:全国个人护理医师,疼痛医生,脊医和针灸师的邮件调查(总计3,000)。结果:八百一十七个响应是可用的(响应率为29%)。为获得全国代表性数据而进行的加权分析表明,五氯苯酚治疗大约52%的慢性疼痛患者,疼痛医生治疗2%,脊医治疗40%,针灸治疗7%。在需要评估的慢性疼痛患者中,随后持续进行治疗的百分比范围为51%(PCP)至63%(疼痛医师)。止痛医生开出的长效阿片类药物(如美沙酮,抗抑郁药或抗惊厥药)和其他非传统镇痛药的使用频率比PCP大约高50-100%。 29%的PCP和16%的疼痛医生报告说,由于监管方面的关注,开出的阿片类药物开处方次数少于他们认为合适的开处方次数。在这四组中,PCP对肌肉骨骼疼痛和神经性疼痛的管理能力最没有信心,并且对所有PCP都必须进行强制性疼痛教育。结论:治疗慢性疼痛的各个学科的态度和实践存在很大差异。此信息可能有助于解释患者在获得疼痛护理方面的差异,计划研究以阐明与不同提供者和治疗策略有关的患者结果以及设计将慢性疼痛患者与合适的从业者和治疗相匹配的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号