...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Safety and efficacy of convection-enhanced delivery of gemcitabine or carboplatin in a malignant glioma model in rats.
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of convection-enhanced delivery of gemcitabine or carboplatin in a malignant glioma model in rats.

机译:在恶性神经胶质瘤模型中吉西他滨或卡铂对流增强递送的安全性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used safely to perfuse regions of the central nervous system (CNS) with therapeutic agents in a manner that bypasses the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These features make CED a potentially ideal method for the distribution of potent chemotherapeutic agents with certain pharmacokinetic properties to tumors of the CNS. To determine the safety and efficacy of the CED of two chemotherapeutic agents (with properties ideal for this method of delivery) into the CNS, the authors perfused naive rats and those harboring 9L gliomas with carboplatin or gemcitabine. METHODS: Dose-escalation toxicity studies were performed by perfusing the striatum (10 microl, 24 rats) and brainstem (10 microl, 16 rats) of naive rats with carboplatin (0.1, 1, and 10 mg/ml) or gemcitabine (0.4, 4, and 40 mg/ml) via CED. Efficacy trials involved the intracranial implantation of 9L tumor cells in 20 Fischer 344 rats. The tumor and surrounding regions were perfused with 40 microl of saline (control group, four rats), 1 mg/ml of carboplatin (four rats), or 4 mg/ml of gemcitabine (four rats) 7 days after implantation. Eight rats harboring the 9L glioma were treated with the systemic administration of 60 mg/kg of carboplatin (four rats) or 150 mg/kg of gemcitabine (four rats) 7 days postimplantation. Clinical, gross, and histological analyses were used to determine toxicity and efficacy. Toxicity occurred in rats that had received only the highest dose of the CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine. Among rats with 9L gliomas, all control and systemically treated animals died within 26 days of tumor implantation. Long-term survival (120 days) and eradication of the tumor occurred in both CED-treated groups (75% of rats in the carboplatin group and 50% of rats in the gemcitabine group). Furthermore, animals harboring the 9L glioma and treated with intratumoral CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine survived significantly longer than controls treated with intratumoral saline (p < 0.01) or systemic chemotherapy(p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The perfusion of sensitive regions of the rat brain can be accomplished without toxicity by using therapeutic concentrations of carboplatin or gemcitabine. In addition, CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine to tumors in this glioma model is safe and has potent antitumor effects. These findings indicate that similar treatment paradigms may be useful in the treatment of glial neoplasms in humans.
机译:目的:对流增强传送(CED)可以安全地用于以绕过血脑屏障(BBB)的方式向中枢神经系统(CNS)区域灌注治疗药物。这些特征使CED成为将具有某些药代动力学特性的有效化学治疗剂分配给CNS肿瘤的潜在理想方法。为了确定两种化学治疗剂(具有适合该递送方法的特性)的CED进入中枢神经系统的安全性和有效性,研究人员给幼稚大鼠和具有9L胶质瘤的大鼠灌了卡铂或吉西他滨。方法:通过对幼稚大鼠的卡铂(0.1、1、10 mg / ml)或吉西他滨(0.4, 4和40 mg / ml)。功效试验涉及在20只Fischer 344大鼠中颅内植入9L肿瘤细胞。植入后7天,向肿瘤及其周围区域灌注40微升盐水(对照组,四只大鼠),1 mg / ml卡铂(四只大鼠)或4 mg / ml吉西他滨(四只大鼠)。植入后第7天,对60只/克卡铂(4只大鼠)或150 mg / kg吉西他滨(4只大鼠)全身给药,治疗了8只藏有9L神经胶质瘤的大鼠。临床,肉眼和组织学分析用于确定毒性和功效。在仅接受最高剂量的卡铂或吉西他滨CED的大鼠中发生了毒性。在患有9L神经胶质瘤的大鼠中,所有对照和经系统治疗的动物在植入肿瘤后26天内死亡。在两个CED治疗组中(卡铂组的75%的大鼠和吉西他滨组的50%的大鼠)都发生了长期生存(120天)并根除了肿瘤。此外,携带9L神经胶质瘤并接受卡铂或吉西他滨瘤内CED治疗的动物存活时间明显长于采用瘤内生理盐水(p <0.01)或全身化疗(p <0.01)治疗的对照组。结论:通过使用治疗浓度的卡铂或吉西他滨可以无毒性地完成大鼠大脑敏感区域的灌注。此外,在该神经胶质瘤模型中,卡铂或吉西他滨对肿瘤的CED是安全的,并且具有有效的抗肿瘤作用。这些发现表明,类似的治疗范例可用于治疗人的神经胶质瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号