...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Systematic review of the prevention of delayed ischemic neurological deficits with hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution therapy following subarachnoid hemorrhage.
【24h】

Systematic review of the prevention of delayed ischemic neurological deficits with hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution therapy following subarachnoid hemorrhage.

机译:对蛛网膜下腔出血后高血压,高血容量和血液稀释疗法预防迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECT: There is uncertainty about the efficacy of hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution (triple-H) therapy in reducing the occurrence of delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DINDs) and death after subarachnoid hemorrhage.The authors therefore conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of triple-H prevention in decreasing the rate of clinical vasospasm, DINDs, and death. METHODS: The authors systematically reviewed studies identified based on a MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE Register search of articles published between 1966 and 2001, and reference lists of identified articles. An independent assessment of each study's methodological quality, population, intervention, and outcomes (rates of symptomatic vasospasm, DINDs, and death) was performed. Summary relative risk estimates were calculated for the main outcomes using fixed- or random-effect models, as appropriate. Only four prospective, comparative studies with a total of 488 patients were identified. The median internal validity score was 0.5 (range 0-2); the median external validity score was 3 (range 2-6). Compared with no prevention, triple-H therapy was associated with a reduced risk of symptomatic vasospasm (relative risk [RR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.65), but not DIND (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.2-1.49). The risk of death was higher (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87). Sensitivity analyses including only randomized, controlled trials showed no evidence of statistically significant results for these major end points. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of information and important limitations in the design of the studies analyzed preclude evaluation of the efficacy of triple-H prevention and formulation of any recommendations regarding its use for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm.
机译:目的:高血压,高血容量和血液稀释(triple-H)治疗在减少蛛网膜下腔出血后延迟性缺血性神经功能缺损(DINDs)的发生和死亡方面的疗效尚不确定,因此作者进行了系统评价以评估其疗效H预防在降低临床血管痉挛,DIND和死亡率方面的作用。方法:作者系统地回顾了根据MEDLINE,EMBASE和COCHRANE注册检索的1966年至2001年之间发表的文章以及已识别文章的参考清单确定的研究。对每项研究的方法学质量,人群,干预措施和结果(症状性血管痉挛,DIND和死亡的比率)进行了独立评估。适当时,使用固定或随机效应模型计算主要结局的简要相对风险估计。仅鉴定了四项前瞻性,比较性研究,共488例患者。内部有效性中位数为0.5(范围为0-2);外部效度中位数为3(范围2-6)。与无预防措施相比,三联H疗法可降低症状性血管痉挛的风险(相对危险度[RR] 0.45,95%置信区间[CI] 0.32-0.65),但与DIND无关(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.2- 1.49)。死亡风险更高(RR 0.68,95%CI 0.53-0.87)。敏感性分析仅包括随机对照试验,没有证据表明这些主要终点有统计学意义的结果。结论:分析设计的研究缺乏信息和重要局限性,因此无法评估三重H预防的功效,并无法制定任何有关预防脑血管痉挛的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号