...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurophysiology >Comparison of external load compensation during rhythmic arm movements and rhythmic jaw movements in humans.
【24h】

Comparison of external load compensation during rhythmic arm movements and rhythmic jaw movements in humans.

机译:在人体有节奏的手臂运动和有规律的下颚运动期间进行外部负载补偿的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experiments were performed on human elbow flexor and extensor muscles and jaw-opening and -closing muscles to observe the effect on rhythmic movements of sudden loading. The load was provided by an electromagnetic device, which simulated the appearance of a smoothly increasing spring-like load. The responses to this loading were compared in jaw and elbow movements and between expected and unexpected disturbances. All muscles showed electromyographic responses to unexpected perturbations, with latencies of approximately 65 ms in the arm muscles and 25 ms in the jaw. When loading was predictable, anticipatory responses started in arm muscles approximately 200 ms before and in jaw muscles 100 ms before the onset of loading. The reflex responses relative to the anticipatory responses were smaller for the arm muscles than for the jaw muscles. The reflex responses in the arm muscles were the same with unexpected and expected perturbations, whereas anticipation increased the reflex responses in the jaw muscles. Biceps brachii and triceps brachii showed similar sensory-induced responses and similar anticipatory responses. Jaw muscles differed, however, in that the reflex response was stronger in masseter than in digastric. It was concluded that reflex responses in the arm muscles cannot overcome the loading of the arm adequately, which is compensated by a large centrally programmed response when loading is predictable. The jaw muscles, particularly the jaw-closing muscles, tend to respond mainly through reflex loops, even when loading of the jaw is anticipated. The differences between the responses of the arm and the jaw muscles may be related to physical differences. For example, the jaw was decelerated more strongly by the load than the heavier arm. The jaw was decelerated strongly but briefly, <30 ms during jaw closing, indicating that muscle force increased before the onset of reflex activity. Apparently, the force-velocity properties of the jaw muscles have a stabilizing effect on the jaw and have this effect before sensory induced responses occur. The symmetrical responses in biceps and triceps indicate similar motor control of both arm muscles. The differences in reflex activity between masseter and digastric muscle indicate fundamental differences in sensory feedback to the jaw-closing muscle and jaw-opening muscle.
机译:在人的肘屈肌和伸肌以及下颌张开和闭合肌肉上进行实验,以观察对突然负荷的节律运动的影响。负载由电磁设备提供,该设备模拟了平滑增加的类似弹簧的负载的外观。在下颌和肘部运动以及预期和意外干扰之间比较了对此载荷的响应。所有肌肉均表现出对意料之外的摄动的肌电反应,臂部肌肉的潜伏期约为65 ms,下巴的潜伏期约为25 ms。当负荷是可预测的时,预期的反应开始于负荷开始前200毫秒左右的臂部肌肉和负荷开始之前100毫秒的颌部肌肉。相对于预期反应,手臂肌肉的反射反应比下颌肌肉的反射反应小。手臂肌肉的反射反应与意外和预期的扰动相同,而预期会增加下颌肌肉的反射反应。肱二头肌和肱三头肌表现出相似的感觉诱发反应和相似的预期反应。然而,下颌肌肉的差异在于,咬肌的反射反应比胃中的反射反应要强。结论是,手臂肌肉的反射反应无法充分克服手臂的负荷,当可预测负荷时,可以通过较大的中央程序反应来补偿。颌骨肌肉,特别是颌骨闭合肌肉,往往会主要通过反射环做出反应,即使预计颌骨负荷也是如此。手臂和下颌肌肉反应之间的差异可能与身体差异有关。例如,下颌受重力的作用比沉重的手臂更强烈。下颌闭合时,下颌强烈但短暂地<30 ms减速,这表明在反射活动开始之前肌肉力量增加了。显然,下颌肌肉的力速特性对下颌具有稳定作用,并且在感觉诱发的反应发生之前具有这种作用。二头肌和三头肌的对称反应表明手臂肌肉的运动控制相似。咬肌和腓肠肌之间反射活动的差异表明对下颚闭合肌肉和下颌开口肌肉的感觉反馈存在根本性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号