首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Expansion Duroplasty Improves Intraspinal Pressure, Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure, and Vascular Pressure Reactivity Index in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Injured Spinal Cord Pressure Evaluation Study
【24h】

Expansion Duroplasty Improves Intraspinal Pressure, Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure, and Vascular Pressure Reactivity Index in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Injured Spinal Cord Pressure Evaluation Study

机译:膨胀性硬膜成形术可改善创伤性脊髓损伤患者的椎管内压力,脊髓灌注压力和血管反应性指数:脊髓损伤的评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We recently showed that, after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), laminectomy does not improve intraspinal pressure (ISP), spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP), or the vascular pressure reactivity index (sPRx) at the injury site sufficiently because of dural compression. This is an open label, prospective trial comparing combined bony and dural decompression versus laminectomy. Twenty-one patients with acute severe TSCI had re-alignment of the fracture and surgical fixation; 11 had laminectomy alone (laminectomy group) and 10 had laminectomy and duroplasty (laminectomy+duroplasty group). Primary outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging evidence of spinal cord decompression (increase in intradural space, cerebrospinal fluid around the injured cord) and spinal cord physiology (ISP, SCPP, sPRx). The laminectomy and laminectomy+duroplasty groups were well matched. Compared with the laminectomy group, the laminectomy+duroplasty group had greater increase in intradural space at the injury site and more effective decompression of the injured cord. In the laminectomy+duroplasty group, ISP was lower, SCPP higher, and sPRx lower, (i.e., improved vascular pressure reactivity), compared with the laminectomy group. Laminectomy+duroplasty caused cerebrospinal fluid leak that settled with lumbar drain in one patient and pseudomeningocele that resolved completely in five patients. We conclude that, after TSCI, laminectomy+duroplasty improves spinal cord radiological and physiological parameters more effectively than laminectomy alone.
机译:我们最近发现,在脊髓外伤(TSCI)后,椎板切除术并不能充分改善硬膜外压,从而无法充分改善损伤部位的脊髓内压(ISP),脊髓灌注压(SCPP)或血管压力反应指数(sPRx)。 。这是一项开放性的前瞻性试验,比较了骨和硬脑膜减压联合椎板切除术。急性重症TSCI患者21例,骨折复位及手术固定。 11例行椎板切除术(椎板切除术组),10例行椎板切除术和硬膜成形术(椎板切除术+硬膜成形术组)。主要结果是磁共振成像显示脊髓减压(硬膜内间隙增加,受伤脊髓周围的脑脊液)和脊髓生理学(ISP,SCPP,sPRx)。椎板切除术和椎板切除术+硬膜成形术组匹配良好。与椎板切除术组相比,椎板切除术+硬膜成形术组在受伤部位的硬膜内间隙增加更大,并且对受伤的脐带减压更有效。与椎板切除术组相比,椎板切除术+硬膜成形术组的ISP较低,SCPP较高,而sPRx较低(即,改善了血管压力反应性)。椎板切除术+硬膜成形术引起脑脊液漏,其中一名患者的腰部引流得以解决,而伪脑膜膨出则在五名患者中得以完全解决。我们得出的结论是,TSCI后,椎板切除+硬膜成形术比单独椎板切除术更有效地改善了脊髓的放射学和生理学参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号