首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Unilateral pedicle screw fixation through a tubular retractor via the Wiltse approach compared with conventional bilateral pedicle screw fixation for single-segment degenerative lumbar instability: A prospective randomized study: Clinical article
【24h】

Unilateral pedicle screw fixation through a tubular retractor via the Wiltse approach compared with conventional bilateral pedicle screw fixation for single-segment degenerative lumbar instability: A prospective randomized study: Clinical article

机译:与传统的双侧椎弓根螺钉固定术相比,单节椎弓根螺钉固定术通过Wiltse方法通过管状牵开器进行单侧椎弓根螺钉固定术:一项前瞻性随机研究:临床文章

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Object. Treatment of patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar instability using unilateral pedicle screw fixation can achieve stability and fusion rates similar to those of bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome of using unilateral pedicle screw fixation through a tubular retractor via the Wiltse approach to treat single-segment degenerative lumbar instability. Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients with single-segment, low-grade, degenerative lumbar instability were randomly assigned to treatment with either unilateral (n = 20) or bilateral (n = 19) pedicle screw fixation. In the unilateral group, patients underwent unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and ipsilateral pedicle screw fixation through a tubular retractor via the Wiltse approach. In the bilateral group, patients underwent modified bilateral PLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation via the posterior midline approach. During follow-up, patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index. Results. The unilateral group had a shorter operative duration (p < 0.05) and less blood loss (p < 0.001). All patients completed more than 2 years of follow-up (mean 36 months). In general, the time trends in improvement on the VAS and JOA differed slightly between the groups through 2 years, but no significant difference in back pain VAS score or leg pain VAS score was found between these 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up. Complete bone fusion was shown on CT in all patients at the 2-year follow-up. Conclusions. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation through a tubular retractor via the Wiltse approach appears to be as safe and effective as bilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar instability.
机译:目的。单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗单节段退行性腰椎不稳的患者可获得与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定相似的稳定性和融合率。这项研究的目的是分析通过Wiltse方法通过管状牵开器单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗单段退行性腰椎不稳的临床结果。方法。连续三十九例单节,低度,退行性腰椎不稳的患者被随机分配接受单侧(n = 20)或双侧(n = 19)椎弓根螺钉固定治疗。在单侧组中,患者通过Wiltse方法通过管状牵开器进行单侧后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)和同侧椎弓根螺钉固定。在双侧组中,患者通过后中线入路对双侧椎弓根螺钉进行改良双侧椎弓根螺钉固定。在随访期间,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS),日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和Oswestry残疾指数对患者进行评估。结果。单侧组的手术时间较短(p <0.05),出血量较少(p <0.001)。所有患者均完成了超过2年的随访(平均36个月)。通常,两组之间在2年内,VAS和JOA改善的时间趋势略有不同,但是在2年的随访中,这两组之间的背痛VAS评分或腿痛VAS评分没有显着差异。 。在2年的随访中,所有患者的CT均显示完全骨融合。结论。对于治疗单段退行性腰椎不稳,通过威尔特斯方法通过管状牵开器进行单侧椎弓根螺钉固定似乎与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定一样安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号