首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neuro-oncology. >Validation of the Medical Research Council and a newly developed prognostic index in patients with malignant glioma: how useful are prognostic indices in routine clinical practice?
【24h】

Validation of the Medical Research Council and a newly developed prognostic index in patients with malignant glioma: how useful are prognostic indices in routine clinical practice?

机译:医学研究委员会的验证以及恶性神经胶质瘤患者新近开发的预后指标:预后指标在常规临床实践中有多大用处?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although different prognostic indices for malignant gliomas have been developed, their validity outside of clinical trials has not been widely tested. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Medical Research Council (MRC) brain tumour prognostic index was able to stratify patients for survival managed in routine practice, and secondly to compare the results with our newly developed prognostic score which included tumour grade and only 3 prognostic groups. The MRC and the new prognostic index were calculated for a group of 119 adult patients with malignant glioma managed by surgical resection/biopsy and post-operative radiotherapy. For the MRC and new score, 6 and 3 prognostic groups were defined, respectively. For all patients median survival was 11 (2-66) months. The overall survival rate at 12 and 24 months were 43% and 18%, respectively. The MRC median and two-year survival rates were 14 months and 26% for a score of 1-10, 14 months and 27% for a score of 11-15, 13 months and 22% for a score of 16-20, 8 months and 10% for a score of 21-25, 8 months and 0% for those scoring 26-33. There was only one patient in the 34-38 group. For the new prognostic index, median and two-year survival rates were respectively 16 and 26%; 12 and 23%; 8 and 7% for the good, intermediate and poor prognostic groups. Both indices were significant factors for survival in univariate analysis (MRC index, p = 0.0089, new index p = 0.0002), but not in multivariate analysis. Both the MRC and our newly devised prognostic score were able to separate patients into good and poor prognostic groups, which may aid in treatment decisions, although there was less differentiation between the MRC groups especially over the first year. Both scores use routinely available factors. However, inclusion of tumour grade in the new score may be an advantage over the MRC index.
机译:尽管已开发出针对恶性神经胶质瘤的不同预后指标,但尚未广泛测试其在临床试验之外的有效性。这项研究的目的是确定医学研究理事会(MRC)的脑肿瘤预后指数是否能够对常规治疗中的患者生存进行分层,其次将结果与我们新开发的预后评分进行比较,该评分包括肿瘤等级,仅3个预后组。通过手术切除/活检和术后放疗,对119例成年恶性神经胶质瘤患者的MRC和新的预后指标进行了计算。对于MRC和新评分,分别定义了6个和3个预后组。对于所有患者,中位生存期为11(2-66)个月。 12个月和24个月的总生存率分别为43%和18%。 MRC的中位和两年生存率分别为14个月和26%(1-10分,14个月)和27%(11-15分,13个月)和22%(16-20、8分)。 21个月的得分为10个月,得分为26-33的得分为8个月,0%。 34-38组中只有一名患者。对于新的预后指标,中位生存期和两年生存率分别为16%和26%; 12%和23%;良好,中度和不良预后组分别为8和7%。在单变量分析中,这两个指数都是存活的重要因素(MRC指数,p = 0.0089,新指数p = 0.0002),而在多变量分析中则不是。 MRC和我们新设计的预后评分均能够将患者分为好的和不良的预后组,这可能有助于做出治疗决策,尽管MRC组之间的差异较小,尤其是在第一年。两个分数均使用常规可用因子。但是,在新评分中包括肿瘤分级可能是优于MRC指数的一项优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号