首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >Metastatic carcinoma of the breast with tubular features: differences compared with metastatic ductal carcinoma of no specific type.
【24h】

Metastatic carcinoma of the breast with tubular features: differences compared with metastatic ductal carcinoma of no specific type.

机译:具有管状特征的乳腺转移癌:与无特定类型的转移性导管癌相比有差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To compare the metastatic pattern at presentation and the prognosis with metastases of 48 patients with carcinomas with tubular features (45 tubular mixed and three pure tubular) and 302 patients with tumours of ductal of no special type (DNST). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database of all patients who developed metastatic disease from carcinoma of the breast in Nottingham, U.K., since 1997. We recorded site of first presentation with metastatic disease, radiological features, histological features and characteristics of the primary tumour. RESULTS: The group of patients with tubular features were older at metastatic presentation (63.9 years vs 59.6 years; P=0.012), had a longer disease-free interval (87 months vs 34 months: P<0.001) and a longer survival with metastases (P<0.002). This group were less likely to have liver metastases (23% vs 41%; P=0.028), in particular multiple liver metastases (50% vs 71%; P=0.015) than the patientswith DNST. Other factors known to be associated with prolonged survival, such as low histological grade of the primary invasive tumour and positive oestrogen receptor (ER) status, were more common in the group of patients with tumours with tubular features (Grade 1: 33% vs 3%; Grade 2: 42% vs 25%; Grade 3: 25% vs 72%; P<0.001), (ER positivity 76% vs 52%; P=0.009). When patients with grade 2 tumours were compared, the age at metastatic presentation, disease-free interval and the presence of multiple liver metastases were still significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma with tubular features have a longer survival with metastases than patients with metastatic DNST carcinoma. This improved survival can be explained by better well-recognised prognostic features, such as metastatic site pattern, histological grade, ER status and disease-free interval.
机译:目的:比较48例具有管状特征的癌(45例混合肾小管和3例纯肾小管癌)和302例非特殊类型导管癌(DNST)的转移和转移预后。材料与方法:自1997年以来,我们从前瞻性维护的数据库中对英国诺丁汉所有因乳腺癌发生转移性疾病的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们记录了首次出现转移性疾病,放射学特征,组织学特征的部位和原发肿瘤的特征。结果:该组具有肾小管特征的患者在转移时年龄较大(63.9岁vs 59.6岁; P = 0.012),无病间隔时间更长(87个月vs 34个月:P <0.001),并且有转移生存时间更长(P <0.002)。与DNST患者相比,该组发生肝转移的可能性较小(23%对41%; P = 0.028),尤其是多发肝转移(50%对71%; P = 0.015)。已知具有延长生存期的其他因素,例如原发性浸润性肿瘤的组织学等级低和雌激素受体(ER)阳性,在具有肾小管特征的肿瘤患者中更为常见(1级:33%vs 3 %;等级2:42%对25%;等级3:25%对72%; P <0.001),(ER阳性率76%对52%; P = 0.009)。当比较具有2级肿瘤的患者时,两组的转移表现年龄,无病间隔和存在多个肝转移的发生率仍存在显着差异。结论:具有管状特征的转移性乳腺癌患者比转移性DNST癌患者的转移生存期更长。更好的公认的预后特征,例如转移部位,组织学等级,ER状态和无病间隔,可以解释生存率的提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号