首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology >Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Different Techniques
【24h】

Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Different Techniques

机译:微创子宫切除术:不同技术的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare conventional minimally invasive (MIS) approaches and newer technology approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. PubMed was searched for all pertinent randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Selected outcomes were compared using standard meta-analysis methods. Three RCTs compared conventional MIS to robotic-assisted hysterectomy and 5 RCTs compared conventional laparoscopy to single-incision hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in outcomes. A subanalysis comparing conventional to robotic-assisted laparoscopy found an association between conventional laparoscopy and shorter operative time. Newer technology approaches do not confer an advantage over conventional MIS approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.
机译:为了比较接受良性疾病子宫切除术的女性的常规微创(MIS)方法和更新的技术方法。在PubMed中搜索了所有相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用标准的荟萃分析方法比较所选结局。 3个RCT将常规MIS与机器人辅助子宫切除术进行了比较,而5个RCT将常规腹腔镜与单切口子宫切除术进行了比较。结果无显着差异。一项将常规腹腔镜检查与机器人辅助腹腔镜检查相比较的亚分析发现,常规腹腔镜检查与较短手术时间之间存在关联。对于因良性疾病而接受子宫切除术的妇女,较新的技术方法没有比传统的MIS方法更具优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号