首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Paying the Pipers: Mitigating the Impact of Anticoagulant Rodenticides on Predators and Scavengers
【24h】

Paying the Pipers: Mitigating the Impact of Anticoagulant Rodenticides on Predators and Scavengers

机译:付钱给吹笛者:减轻抗凝血杀鼠剂对捕食者和清除剂的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anticoagulant rodenticides, mainly second-generation forms, or SGARs, dominate the global market for rodent control. Introduced in the 1970s to counter genetic resistance in rodent populations to first-generation compounds such as warfarin, SGARs are extremely toxic and highly effective killers. However, their tendency to persist and accumulate in the body has led to the widespread contamination of terrestrial predators and scavengers. Commercial chemicals that are classified by regulators as persistent, bio-accumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals and that are widely used with potential environmental release, such as dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), have been removed from commerce. However, despite consistently failing ecological risk assessments, SGARs remain in use because of the demand for effective rodent-control options and the lack of safe and humane alternatives. Although new risk-mitigation measures for rodenticides are now in effect in some countries, the contamination and poisoning of nontarget wildlife are expected to continue. Here, we suggest options to further attenuate this problem.
机译:抗凝杀鼠剂(主要是第二代形式)或SGAR占据着全球灭鼠控制市场。 SGAR是在1970年代引入的,目的是对抗啮齿动物种群对第一代化合物(如华法林)的遗传抗性,是极毒且高效的杀手。但是,它们在体内持续存留的趋势导致了陆地掠食者和清除剂的广泛污染。监管机构将其归类为持久性,生物蓄积性和有毒(PBT)化学品的商业化学品,这些化学品已被广泛使用,具有潜在的环境释放作用,例如二氯二苯基三氯乙烷(DDT)或多氯联苯(PCB)。来自商业。然而,尽管一直未能通过生态风险评估,但由于对有效的啮齿动物控制选择的需求以及缺乏安全和人道的替代品,因此SGAR仍在使用。尽管某些国家现在已开始采取新的减轻灭鼠剂的风险措施,但非目标野生生物的污染和中毒预计仍将继续。在这里,我们建议进一步缓解此问题的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号