...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medicinal Chemistry >Modeling the Adenosine Receptors: Comparison of the Binding Domains of A_(2A) Agonists and Antagonists
【24h】

Modeling the Adenosine Receptors: Comparison of the Binding Domains of A_(2A) Agonists and Antagonists

机译:建模腺苷受体:A_(2A)激动剂和拮抗剂的结合域的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A three-dimensional model of the human A_(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) and its docked ligands was built by homology to rhodopsin and validated with site-directed mutagenesis and the synthesis of chemically complementary agonists. Different binding modes of A_(2A)AR antagonists and agonists were compared by using the FlexiDock automated docking procedure, with manual adjustment. Putative binding regions for the 9H-purine ring in agonist NECA 3 and the 1H-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline ring in antagonist CGS15943 I overlapped, and the exocyclic amino groups of each were H-bonded to the side chain of N~(6.55). For bound agonist, H-bonds formed between the ribose 3'- and 5'-substituents ad the hydrophilic amino acids T~(3.36), S~(7.42), and H~(7.43), and the terminal methyl group of the 5'-uronamide interacted with the hydrophobic side chain of F~(6.44). Formation of the agonist complex destabilized the ground-state structure of the A_(2A)AR, which was stabilized through a network of H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions in the transmembrane helical domain (TM) regions, facilitating a conformational change upon activation. Both flexibility of the ribose moiety, required for the movement of TM6, and its H-bonding to the receptor were important for agonism. Two sets of interhelical H-bonds involved residues conserved among ARs but not in rhodopsin: (1) E13~(7.46), and H278~(7.43) and (2) D52~(2.50), with the highly conserved amino acids N280~(7.45) and S281~(7.46), and N284~(7.49) with S91~(3.39). Most of the amino acid residues lining the putative binding site(s) were conserved among the four AR subtypes. The A_(2A)AR/3 complex showed a preference for an intermediate conformation about the glycosidic bond, unlike in the A_3AR/3 complex, which featured an anti-conformation. Hydrophilic amino acids of TMs 3 and 7 (ribose-binding region) were replaced with anionic residues for enhanced binding to amine-derivatized agonists. We identified new neoceptor (T88D)-neoligand pairs that were consistent with the model.
机译:通过与视紫红质的同源性建立人A_(2A)腺苷受体(AR)及其对接配体的三维模型,并通过定点诱变和化学互补激动剂的合成进行验证。通过使用FlexiDock自动对接程序以及手动调整,比较了A_(2A)AR拮抗剂和激动剂的不同结合模式。激动剂NECA 3中9H嘌呤环的推定结合区与拮抗剂CGS15943 I中1H- [1,2,4]三唑并[1,5-c]喹唑啉环的推定结合区重叠,并且各自的环外氨基为H-结合到N〜(6.55)的侧链上对于结合的激动剂,在核糖的3'-和5'-取代基之间形成的H键具有亲水性氨基酸T〜(3.36),S〜(7.42)和H〜(7.43),以及其末端甲基。 5'-脲酰胺与F〜(6.44)的疏水侧链相互作用。激动剂复合物的形成使A_(2A)AR的基态结构不稳定,该基团通过跨膜螺旋结构域(TM)区域中的H键和疏水相互作用网络稳定化,从而促进了激活时的构象变化。 TM6的运动所需的核糖部分的柔韧性及其与受体的H键结合对于激动作用都非常重要。两组螺旋间的H键涉及AR之间的保守残基,而不是视紫红质中的残基:(1)E13〜(7.46),H278〜(7.43)和(2)D52〜(2.50),具有高度保守的氨基酸N280〜。 (7.45)和S281〜(7.46),以及N284〜(7.49)和S91〜(3.39)。排列在假定的结合位点上的大多数氨基酸残基在四种AR亚型中是保守的。 A_(2A)AR / 3复合物显示出对糖苷键中间构象的偏爱,与A_3AR / 3复合物不同,后者具有反构象。 TM 3和7(核糖结合区)的亲水氨基酸被阴离子残基取代,以增强与胺衍生的激动剂的结合。我们确定了新的新受体(T88D)-neolgand对,与模型一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号