...
首页> 外文期刊>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon >Further experience with the 'no-reacto' bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis: 11-year single center results in 402 patients
【24h】

Further experience with the 'no-reacto' bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis: 11-year single center results in 402 patients

机译:活动性感染性心内膜炎患者使用“无反应”生物假体的进一步经验:11年单中心研究结果为402名患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives We investigated early, midterm, and long-term results following valve replacement with the "No-Reacto" bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis (AIE). Patients and Methods Between February 2000 and February 2011, a total of 402 patients (median 61 years, 17 to 91 years) received "No-Reacto" bioprostheses due to single valve AIE in 315 (aortic valve replacement n = 158, aortic conduit n = 30, mitral valve replacement n = 116, tricuspid valve replacement n = 11) and double valve AIE in 87 cases. Prosthetic AIE was found in 105 patients (26.1%). Mean follow-up was 2.8 ± 3.2 years (1 month to 11.4 years) with 1,124 patient years, completed in 97.1%. This retrospective study analyzes both prospectively updated data (n = 255) and patients recently operated upon (n = 147). Results There was a highly significant difference in the survival between patients operated on urgently and patients operated on in an emergency (30-day, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival were 80.9 ± 2.3%, 63.8 ± 2.9%, 48.3 ± 3.3%, and 39.7 ± 4.1% vs. 61.3 ± 4.5%, 45.0 ± 4.7%, 33.1 ± 4.6%, and 14.0 ± 5.1%, respectively, p < 0.001), due to native versus prosthetic AIE (p = 0.032), single versus double valve replacement (p = 0.005), and with or without abscess formation (p < 0.001). Thirty-day, 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation due to recurrent endocarditis were 100%, 95.1 ± 1.4%, 86.4 ± 2.6%, and 82.1 ± 3.6% and due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) were 100%, 100%, 98.9 ± 0.8%, and 91.4 ± 4.0%, respectively. There was no difference in prosthesis durability between the older (> 60 years) and the younger patients. Conclusions Our experience in the use of "No-Reacto" bioprostheses in patients with native and prosthetic AIE shows satisfactory early, midterm, and long-term results, in particular low rates of reoperation due to recurrent endocarditis and SVD. Because these prostheses are readily available and their implantation straightforward, we strongly recommend their use in patients with AIE. Patients' survival differed significantly depending on their surgical urgency. Early mortality was independently predicted by septic shock, abscess formation, and number of implanted valves besides age per 10 years.
机译:目的我们研究了活动性感染性心内膜炎(AIE)患者用“ No-Reacto”生物假体置换瓣膜后的早期,中期和长期结果。患者与方法从2000年2月至2011年2月,共有402名患者(中位61岁,17至91岁)因单瓣AIE在315中接受了“无反应”生物假体(主动脉瓣置换n = 158,主动脉导管n = 30,二尖瓣置换n = 116,三尖瓣置换n = 11)和双瓣AIE在87例中。在105例患者中发现了人工AIE(占26.1%)。平均随访时间为2.8±3.2年(1个月至11.4年),有1124患者年,完成率为97.1%。这项回顾性研究分析了前瞻性更新的数据(n = 255)和最近接受手术的患者(n = 147)。结果急诊手术患者和紧急手术患者的生存率差异显着(30天,1、5、10年生存率分别为80.9±2.3%,63.8±2.9%,48.3) ±3.3%和39.7±4.1%,分别为61.3±4.5%,45.0±4.7%,33.1±4.6%和14.0±5.1%,p <0.001),这是由于天然AIE与人工AIE(p = 0.032) ,单瓣置换与双瓣置换(p = 0.005),有无脓肿形成(p <0.001)。复发性心内膜炎导致的30天,1、5和10年无再次手术的机会分别为100%,95.1±1.4%,86.4±2.6%和82.1±3.6%,并且由于结构性瓣膜恶化(SVD)为分别为100%,100%,98.9±0.8%和91.4±4.0%。年龄较大(> 60岁)和年龄较小的患者之间的假体耐久性没有差异。结论我们在天然和假体AIE患者中使用“无反应”生物假体的经验显示出令人满意的早期,中期和长期结果,特别是由于复发性心内膜炎和SVD而导致的再手术率较低。由于这些假体易于获得且植入简单,我们强烈建议将其用于AIE患者。根据手术的紧急程度,患者的生存率差异显着。败血症性休克,脓肿的形成以及除每10岁年龄以外植入的瓣膜数量独立地预测了早期死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号