...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Virology >Comparison of multiplex PCR assays and conventional techniques for the diagnostic of respiratory virus infections in children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness.
【24h】

Comparison of multiplex PCR assays and conventional techniques for the diagnostic of respiratory virus infections in children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness.

机译:多重PCR检测方法与常规技术对急性呼吸系统疾病住院儿童的呼吸道病毒感染诊断的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performances of four multiplex PCR (m-PCR) were compared to direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and HuH7 cell culture for the detection of viruses in 263 children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness. One hundred fifty (57.6%) nasal aspirates were found DFA-positive; 188 (72.3%) were found positive by both DFA and HuH7 cell culture, and 242 (92%) were PCR-positive. The m-PCR detected 124 viruses which were not found by conventional methods: 68 rhinovirus, 17 human metapneumovirus, 15 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), 8 parainfluenza virus (PIV), 5 coronavirus 229E, 3 OC43 and 3 NL63, 4 enterovirus, 2 influenza virus B and C virus. The m-PCR were more sensitive, had the advantages of a shorter delay in specific diagnosis, and a lower cost than DFA and culture. Using these m-PCR, the prevalence of each virus was compared between in-patient and out-patient groups of children attending the emergency unit of the hospital. Nasal aspirates from 411 (91.5%) children were found positiveby the PCRs. RSV, rhinovirus, and influenza virus were the most frequent viruses detected in this population, representing 43.6%, 31.8%, and 8.8% of the virus found, respectively, followed by human metapneumovirus (4.4%), coronavirus (3.4%), parainfluenza virus (3.2%), adenovirus (2.3%), and enterovirus (2.1%). RSVs were detected more significantly in the in-patient group than in the out-patient group, and influenza viruses were detected more frequently in the out-patient group than in the in-patient group. Moreover, the use of m-PCR pointed out the frequency of rhinovirus and mixed viral detections in these patients. In conclusion, according to the requirements of speed and low cost of the methods, and to achieve the highest rate of detection of respiratory viruses, the combined use of DFA and m-PCR is today likely to be the best way to improve diagnosis of respiratory illnesses in children.
机译:将四种多重PCR(m-PCR)的性能与直接免疫荧光测定(DFA)和HuH7细胞培养进行了比较,以检测263名急性呼吸道疾病住院儿童的病毒。发现150例(57.6%)鼻腔抽吸物DFA阳性; DFA和HuH7细胞培养均发现188例(72.3%)阳性,PCR阳性242例(92%)。 m-PCR检测到124种常规方法未发现的病毒:68种鼻病毒,17种人间质肺病毒,15种呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV),8种副流感病毒(PIV),5种冠状病毒229E,3种OC43和3种NL63、4种肠病毒, 2乙型和丙型流感病毒。与DFA和培养相比,m-PCR灵敏度更高,具有特异性诊断延迟更短,成本更低的优点。使用这些m-PCR,比较了在医院急诊室的住院患者和门诊儿童组中每种病毒的流行程度。 PCR检测发现411名(91.5%)儿童的鼻腔吸出物呈阳性。 RSV,鼻病毒和流感病毒是该人群中最常见的病毒,分别占发现的病毒的43.6%,31.8%和8.8%,其次是人间质肺炎病毒(4.4%),冠状病毒(3.4%)和副流感病毒(3.2%),腺病毒(2.3%)和肠病毒(2.1%)。与门诊组相比,在住院组中检测到的RSV更为显着,而在门诊组中检测到流感病毒的频率更高。此外,m-PCR的使用指出了这些患者中鼻病毒和混合病毒检测的频率。总之,根据方法的快速性和低成本的要求,并实现呼吸道病毒的最高检出率,如今,DFA和m-PCR的结合使用可能是改善呼吸道诊断的最佳方法。小儿疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号