首页> 外文期刊>Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection: Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi >Epidemiology and diagnostic methodology for enterovirus infection, including cerebrospinal fluid analysis: a 5-year review.
【24h】

Epidemiology and diagnostic methodology for enterovirus infection, including cerebrospinal fluid analysis: a 5-year review.

机译:肠病毒感染的流行病学和诊断方法,包括脑脊液分析:5年回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Enterovirus is the most common pathogen of human illness, but data on epidemiology and laboratory diagnosis of enterovirus from Taiwan are rare. We reviewed hospital records to determine the types of enterovirus isolated and the adequacy of the laboratory diagnostic methods. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed hospital records, laboratory results, and medical records of patients infected with enterovirus visiting Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, during a 5-year period from January 2001 through December 2005. The review included analysis of cell counts and biochemistry of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). RESULTS: 290 strains were isolated. After rhinoviruses were excluded, 288 strains of enteroviruses were included for evaluation. Coxsackievirus A accounted for 18.8% of isolates. Among coxsackievirus B serotypes B2, B3 and B5, 79/94 isolates (84.0%) replicated in human larynx carcinoma (HEP2) cells, while 42/74 serotype B4 isolates (56.8%) grew in rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells. Growth of echovirus in RD and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MRC-5) cells occurred for 23/34 positive isolates (68.0%). Twenty four patients had well-documented cell count and biochemistry of CSF. A predominance of polymorphonuclear cells and increasing protein level of the central nervous system, together with empiric antibiotic therapy, was noted in 15/24 of patients (62.5%). CONCLUSION: Use of multiple cell media and sampling of multiple sites remain the best methods for recovery of enterovirus. To improve the effectiveness of enterovirus isolation and avoid unnecessary use of antibiotics, increased use of rapid, sensitive laboratory diagnostic methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, may be appropriate.
机译:背景与目的:肠病毒是人类疾病中最常见的病原体,但是台湾有关肠病毒的流行病学和实验室诊断的数据很少。我们回顾了医院记录,以确定分离出的肠病毒的类型以及实验室诊断方法的适当性。方法:这项回顾性研究回顾了从2001年1月至2005年12月的5年期间访问台湾台北市台北荣民总医院的肠道病毒感染患者的医院记录,实验室结果和医疗记录。该评价包括细胞计数分析脑脊液的化学和生物化学。结果:分离到290株。在排除鼻病毒之后,包括288株肠病毒用于评估。柯萨奇病毒A占分离株的18.8%。在柯萨奇病毒B血清型B2,B3和B5中,在人喉癌(HEP2)细胞中复制了79/94分离株(84.0%),而在横纹肌肉瘤(RD)细胞中生长了42/74血清型B4分离株(56.8%)。 23/34阳性分离株(68.0%)在RD和Madin-Darby犬肾(MRC-5)细胞中出现了回声病毒的生长。 24名患者的脑脊液细胞计数和生化有据可查。 15/24的患者(62.5%)注意到多形核细胞占优势,中枢神经系统蛋白质水平增加,并辅以经验性抗生素治疗。结论:使用多种细胞培养基和对多个部位取样仍是恢复肠病毒的最佳方法。为了提高肠道病毒分离的效率并避免不必要地使用抗生素,增加使用快速,灵敏的实验室诊断方法(例如聚合酶链反应)可能是合适的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号