...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ultrasound. >Comparison of Two Elasticity Scoring Systems in the Assessment of the Cervical Lymph Nodes
【24h】

Comparison of Two Elasticity Scoring Systems in the Assessment of the Cervical Lymph Nodes

机译:两种弹性评分系统在颈淋巴结评估中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Real-time elastography (RTE) and elasticity scoring system is a new diagnostic tool in the evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes (LNs). The aim of the study was to investigate the validity and reliability of two elasticity scoring systems in discriminating cervical lymphadenopathies.Materials and methods: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the local ethics committee. Ninety-eight consecutive patients underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy after conventional ultrasound and RTE evaluation. Elasticity scores were divided into four and five categories according to signal distribution, based on previously determined models. Two independent raters analyzed the elastographic data. Results: Final histology revealed 60 benign and 38 malignant cervical LNs. In the four-point scoring system, 41/60 benign LNs were classified as score 1 or 2 and 28/38 malignant nodes as score 3 or 4 [sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 68.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 59.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) 80.4%]. Using the five-point scoring system, 28/60 benign nodes were classified as score 1 or 2 and 31 /38 malignant nodes as score 3-5 (sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 45.0%, PPV 47.6%, NPV 80.4%). In the four-point scoring system, rates of concordance between raters (k = 0.63) and with the same rater (k = 0.75) were both good with statistical significance (both p < 0.01). With the five-point scoring system, both kappa statistic tests between raters (k = 0.68) and with the same rater (k = 0.68) were also good with statistical significance (both p < 0.01).Conclusion: For qualitative RTE, the four-point scoring system had value similar to the five-point scoring system in predicting malignancy in cervical LNs. Furthermore, the reliability was comparable in both sconng systems. I or the purpose of simplified evaluation, we sug gested using the four-point sconng system to rate the qualitative RTE in the future.
机译:背景:实时弹性成像(RTE)和弹性评分系统是评估颈淋巴结肿大(LNs)的新诊断工具。这项研究的目的是研究两种弹性评分系统在区分颈淋巴腺病中的有效性和可靠性。材料和方法:研究方案经当地伦理委员会的机构审查委员会批准。在常规超声和RTE评估后,连续对98例患者进行了超声引导下的细针穿刺活检。根据先前确定的模型,根据信号分布,弹性分数分为四类和五类。两名独立评估者分析了弹性成像数据。结果:最终的组织学结果显示60例良性LN和38例恶性宫颈LN。在四分制评分系统中,将41/60个良性LN分为1或2级,将28/38恶性淋巴结分为3或4级[敏感性73.7%,特异性68.3%,阳性预测值(PPV)59.6%,阴性预测值(NPV)80.4%]。使用五点评分系统,将28/60个良性淋巴结分为1或2级,将31/38恶性淋巴结分为3-5级(敏感性79.0%,特异性45.0%,PPV 47.6%,NPV 80.4%)。在四点评分系统中,评估者之间的一致性比率(k = 0.63)和相同评估者之间的一致性比率(k = 0.75)均具有统计学意义(均p <0.01)。在五点评分系统中,评估者之间的kappa统计检验(k = 0.68)和相同评估者之间的kappa统计检验(k = 0.68)都具有统计学意义(均p <0.01)。结论:对于定性RTE,这四个点五点评分系统在预测宫颈LNs恶性度方面具有与五点数评分系统相似的价值。此外,在两个点火系统中,可靠性都是可比的。出于简化评估的目的,我们建议使用四点搜寻系统对将来的定性RTE进行评级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号