...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical toxicology: official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology >Chronic Treatment with Naltrexone Prevents Memory Retention Deficits in Rats Poisoned with the Sarin Analog Diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and Treated with Atropine and Pralidoxime.
【24h】

Chronic Treatment with Naltrexone Prevents Memory Retention Deficits in Rats Poisoned with the Sarin Analog Diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and Treated with Atropine and Pralidoxime.

机译:纳曲酮的慢性治疗可防止因沙林类似物二异丙基氟磷酸酯(DFP)中毒并经阿托品和普拉多肟治疗的大鼠的记忆力保持障碍。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Humans and rats poisoned with sarin develop chronic neurological disabilities that are not prevented with standardized antidotal therapy. We hypothesized that rats poisoned with the sarin analogue diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and resuscitated with atropine and pralidoxime would have long-term memory deficits that were preventable with naltrexone treatment. Long Evans rats (250-275 g) were randomized to: DFP (N?=?8): single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DFP (5 mg/kg). Treatment (N?=?9): DFP (5 mg/kg) followed by chronic naltrexone (5 mg/kg/day × 12 weeks). Control (N?=?12): single SC injection of isopropyl alcohol, (DFP vehicle) followed by chronic naltrexone (5 mg/kg/day). If toxicity developed after injection, antidotal therapy was initiated with atropine (2 mg/kg) and pralidoxime (25 mg/kg) and repeated as needed. After 12 weeks, rats underwent testing for place learning (acquisition) across 5 days of training using the Morris Water Maze. On day 6 a memory retention test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Rats receiving DFP rapidly developed toxicity requiring antidotal rescue. No differences in acquisition were seen between the DFP vs. DFP?+?naltrexone rats. During memory testing, DFP-poisoned rats spent significantly less time (29.4?±?2.11 versus 38.5?±?2.5 s, p??0.05) on the test for memory retention. Poisoning with DFP induced impaired memory retention. Deficits were not prevented by acute rescue with atropine and pralidoxime. Chronic naltrexone treatment led to preserved memory after DFP poisoning.
机译:被沙林毒害的人和大鼠会发展出慢性神经功能障碍,而标准化的解毒剂并不能预防这种疾病。我们假设用沙林类似物二异丙基氟磷酸酯(DFP)中毒并用阿托品和普利多肟复苏的大鼠将具有长期的记忆缺陷,而纳曲酮治疗可预防该缺陷。将长Evans大鼠(250-275 g)随机分为:DFP(N?=?8):DFP单次皮下(SC)注射(5 mg / kg)。处理(N≥9):DFP(5mg / kg),然后是慢性纳曲酮(5mg / kg /天×12周)。对照(N≥12):单次SC注射异丙醇(DFP媒介物),然后注射慢性纳曲酮(5mg / kg /天)。如果注射后出现毒性,则开始用阿托品(2 mg / kg)和普利肟肟(25 mg / kg)进行解毒治疗,并根据需要重复进行。 12周后,大鼠在5天的训练中使用Morris水迷宫进行了位置学习(获取)测试。在第6天,进行记忆保留测试。使用IBM SPSS Statistics进行统计分析。接受DFP的大鼠迅速产生毒性,需要解毒解毒。 DFP与DFP +纳曲酮大鼠之间的采集无差异。在记忆力测试期间,DFP中毒的大鼠花费的时间显着减少(29.4±±2.11比38.5±±2.5 s,p 0.05),行进距离更短(267±±24.6与370±27.5厘米,与治疗组相比,在目标象限中的p?<?0.05)。在记忆保持力测试中,治疗大鼠的表现与对照大鼠相同(p≥0.05)。 DFP中毒会导致记忆力受损。用阿托品和普利肟肟进行急救并不能预防缺乏症。慢性纳曲酮治疗导致DFP中毒后记忆得以保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号