首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Economics >Endogenous mechanisms and Nash equilibrium in competitivecontracting games
【24h】

Endogenous mechanisms and Nash equilibrium in competitivecontracting games

机译:竞争契约博弈中的内生机制与纳什均衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We model strategic competition in a market with asymmetric information as a noncoop-erative game in which each firm competes for the business of a buyer of unknown typeby offering the buyer a catalog of products and prices. The timing in our model is Stack-elberg: in the first stage, given the distribution of buyer types known to all firms and thededucible, type-dependent best responses of the agent, firms simultaneously and nonco-operatively choose their catalog offers. In the second stage the buyer, knowing his type,chooses a single firm and product-price pair from that firm's catalog. By backward induc-tion, this Stackelberg game with asymmetric information reduces to a game over catalogswith payoff indeterminacies. In particular, due to ties within catalogs and/or across cata-logs, corresponding to any catalog profile offered by firms there may be multiple possibleexpected firm payoffs, all consistent with the rational optimizing behavior of the agentfor each of his types. The resolution of these indeterminacies depends on The tie-breakingmechanism which emerges in the market. Because each tie-breaking mechanism induces aparticular game over catalogs, a reasonable candidate would be a tie-breaking mechanismwhich supports a Nash equilibrium in the corresponding catalog game. We call such a mech-anism an endogenous Nash mechanism. The fundamental question we address in this paperis, does there exist an endogenous Nash mechanism—and therefore, does there exist a Nashequilibrium for the catalog game? We show under fairly mild conditions on primitives thatcatalog games naturally possess tie-breaking mechanisms which support Nash equilibria.
机译:我们将具有不对称信息的市场中的战略竞争建模为一种不合作的博弈,其中每个公司通过为买方提供产品和价格目录来竞争未知类型买方的业务。我们模型的时机是Stack-elberg:在第一阶段,考虑到所有公司都知道买方类型的分布以及代理商可推论的,取决于类型的最佳响应,企业同时和非合作地选择其目录报价。在第二阶段,买主知道他的类型,从该公司的目录中选择单个公司和产品价格对。通过向后诱导,这种具有不对称信息的Stackelberg游戏简化为具有收益不确定性的目录游戏。特别是,由于目录内和/或目录之间的联系,对应于公司提供的任何目录配置文件,可能会有多种可能的公司收益,所有收益均与代理人针对其每种类型的理性优化行为相一致。这些不确定性的解决方法取决于市场上出现的打破常规的机制。因为每种平局决胜机制都会引发针对目录的特殊博弈,所以一个合理的候选者应该是能够在相应的目录博弈中支持纳什均衡的平局决胜机制。我们称这种机制为内生的纳什机制。我们在本文中要解决的基本问题是,是否存在内生的Nash机制-因此,是否存在用于目录博弈的Nash均衡?我们在相当温和的条件下对原始游戏表明,目录游戏自然具有支持纳什均衡的打破平局机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号