What is the role of topos theory in the topos models for quantum theory as used by Isham, Butterfield, D?ring, Heunen, Landsman, Spitters, and others? In other words, what is the interplay between physical motivation for themodels and themathematical framework used in these models? Concretely, we show that the presheaf topos model of Butterfield, Isham, and D?ring resembles classical physics when viewed from the internal language of the presheaf topos, similar to the copresheaf topos model of Heunen, Landsman, and Spitters. Both the presheaf and copresheaf models provide a “quantum logic” in the form of a complete Heyting algebra. Although these algebras are natural from a topos theoretic stance, we seek a physical interpretation for the logical operations. Finally,we investigate dynamics. In particular,we describe howan automorphism on the operator algebra induces a homeomorphism (or isomorphism of locales) on the associated state spaces of the topos models, and how elementary propositions and truth values transform under the action of this homeomorphism. Also with dynamics the focus is on the internal perspective of the topos.
展开▼
