首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Biology >No BLUE among phylogenetic estimators.
【24h】

No BLUE among phylogenetic estimators.

机译:在系统发育估计中没有蓝色。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multivariate analysis is a branch of statistics that successfully exploits the powerful tools of linear algebra to obtain a fairly comprehensive theory of estimation. The purpose of this paper is to explore to what extent a linear theory of estimation can be developed in the context of coalescent models used in the analysis of DNA polymorphism. We consider a large class of coalescent models, of which the neutral infinite sites model is one example. In the process, we discover several limitations of linear estimators that are quite distinct from those in the classical theory. In particular, we prove that there does not exist a uniformly BLUE (best linear unbiased estimator) for the scaled mutation parameter, under the assumptions of the neutral model of evolution. In fact, we show that no linear estimator performs uniformly better than the Watterson (1975) method based on the total number of segregating sites. For certain coalescent models, the segregating-sites estimator is actually optimal.The general conclusion is the following. If genealogical information is useful for estimating the rate of evolution, then there is no optimal linear method. If there is an optimal linear method, then no information other than the total number of segregating sites is needed.
机译:多元分析是统计学的一个分支,成功地利用了线性代数的强大工具来获得相当全面的估计理论。本文的目的是探讨在DNA多态性分析所使用的合并模型的背景下,线性估计理论可以发展到什么程度。我们考虑了一大类合并模型,其中中立的无穷大站点模型就是一个例子。在此过程中,我们发现线性估计量的一些局限性与经典理论中的局限性截然不同。特别是,我们证明了在中性进化模型的假设下,针对缩放的突变参数不存在统一的BLUE(最佳线性无偏估计量)。实际上,我们表明,基于分离点的总数,没有任何线性估计器的性能均匀地优于Watterson(1975)方法。对于某些合并模型,隔离点估计量实际上是最优的。一般结论如下。如果家谱信息可用于估计进化率,则没有最佳的线性方法。如果有最佳的线性方法,则除了分离位点的总数外,不需要其他信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号