首页> 外文期刊>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries >Flame acceleration in tube explosions with up to three flat-bar obstacles with variable obstacle separation distance
【24h】

Flame acceleration in tube explosions with up to three flat-bar obstacles with variable obstacle separation distance

机译:具有多达三个可变障碍物间隔距离的扁平障碍物的爆炸中的火焰加速

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effect of obstacle separation distance on the severity of gas explosions has received little methodical study. It was the aim of this work to investigate the influence of obstacle spacing of up to three flat-bar obstacles. The tests were performed using methane-air (10% by vol.), in an elongated vented cylindrical vessel 162 mm internal diameter with an overall length-to-diameter, LID, of 27.7. The obstacles had either 2 or 4 flat-bars and presenting 20% blockage ratio to the flow path. The different number of flat-bars for the same blockage achieved a change of the obstacle scale which was also part of this investigation. The first two obstacles were kept at the established optimum spacing and only the spacing between the second and third obstacles was varied. The profiles of maximum flame speed and overpressure with separation distance were shown to agree with the cold flow turbulence profile determined in cold flows by other researchers. However, the present results showed that the maximum effect in explosions is experienced at 80 to 100 obstacle scales about 4 times further downstream than the position of maximum turbulence determined in the cold flow studies. Similar trends were observed for the flames speeds. In both cases the optimum spacing between the second and third obstacles corresponded to the same optimum spacing found for the first two obstacles demonstrating that the optimum separation distance does not change with number of obstacles. In planning the layout of new installations, the worst case separation distance needs to be avoided but incorporated when assessing the risk to existing setups. The results clearly demonstrate that high congestion in a given layout does not necessarily imply higher explosion severity as traditionally assumed. Less congested but optimally separated obstructions can lead to higher overpressures. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:障碍物分隔距离对瓦斯爆炸严重性的影响尚未得到系统的研究。这项工作的目的是研究多达三个扁平障碍物的障碍物间距的影响。使用甲烷空气(体积分数为10%),在内径为162 mm的细长排气圆筒形容器中进行测试,其总长径比LID为27.7。障碍物有2个或4个扁杆,对流路的阻塞率为20%。对于相同的障碍物,不同数量的扁杠实现了障碍物比例的改变,这也是该研究的一部分。前两个障碍物保持在确定的最佳间距,并且仅第二和第三障碍物之间的间距发生了变化。最大火焰速度和超压随分离距离的变化曲线表明与其他研究人员在冷流中确定的冷流湍流曲线一致。然而,目前的结果表明,在爆炸的最大影响发生在80到100个障碍物标度上,比在冷流研究中确定的最大湍流位置大约下游4倍。火焰速度观察到类似趋势。在这两种情况下,第二障碍物和第三障碍物之间的最佳间距都对应于前两个障碍物的最佳间距,这表明最佳分隔距离不会随障碍物的数量而变化。在规划新设备的布局时,需要避免最坏情况下的分隔距离,但应在评估现有设备的风险时将其合并。结果清楚地表明,给定布局中的高度拥挤并不一定意味着像传统上所假定的那样具有更高的爆炸严重性。较不拥挤但分隔得最好的障碍物可能导致较高的超压。 Crown版权所有(C)2015,由Elsevier Ltd.发行。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号