首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT >Low back pain: clinimetric properties of the Trendelenburg test, active straight leg raise test, and breathing pattern during active straight leg raising.
【24h】

Low back pain: clinimetric properties of the Trendelenburg test, active straight leg raise test, and breathing pattern during active straight leg raising.

机译:腰痛:Trendelenburg测试,主动直腿抬高测试的斜度特性以及主动直腿抬高期间的呼吸模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Classification of patients with low back pain (LBP) into subgroups is important as considerable variability exists in the LBP population. Clinical applicable, reliable, and valid tests to differentiate patients with LBP are therefore necessary. The purpose of this study is to examine the reliability, internal consistency, and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests that analyze motor control mechanisms of the lumbopelvic region in patients with nonspecific LBP. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with chronic nonspecific LBP volunteered for the study (cross-sectional design). The patients were examined by 2 assessors who were blinded to the results of each other. The following tests were performed: the Trendelenburg test, the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test, and the ASLR with visual inspection of the breathing pattern. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability coefficients (kappa) were greater than 0.75 for the Trendelenburg score and greater than 0.70 for the ASLR. The interobserver reliability coefficients were greater than 0.39 for the assessment of the breathing pattern during the ASLR. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the Trendelenburg and ASLR tests was greater than .73. No significant associations were found between the outcome of the tests and self-reported pain severity or disability. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence favoring the test-retest reliability of the Trendelenburg and ASLR tests in patients with LBP. The internal consistency of the outcome of these tests was high for both assessors, suggesting that these tests assess the same dimension. The interobserver reliability of the assessment of the breathing pattern was fair to moderate. Further research regarding the interobserver reliability, clinical importance, validity, and responsiveness of the Trendelenburg test, ASLR test, and breathing pattern during these tests is required.
机译:目的:将腰痛(LBP)患者分为亚组很重要,因为LBP人群中存在相当大的变异性。因此,需要临床适用,可靠和有效的测试来区分LBP患者。这项研究的目的是检查3种临床试验的可靠性,内部一致性和临床重要性,这些临床试验分析了非特异性LBP患者腰盆区域运动控制机制。方法:36例慢性非特异性LBP患者自愿参加研究(横断面设计)。由2位评估者对患者进行检查,评估者对彼此的结果不了解。进行了以下测试:特伦德伦伯卧位测试,主动直腿抬高(ASLR)测试以及带有视觉检查呼吸模式的ASLR。结果:Trendelenburg评分的重测信度系数(kappa)大于0.75,而ASLR大于0.70。对于ASLR期间的呼吸模式评估,观察者之间的可靠性系数大于0.39。 Trendelenburg和ASLR测试的内部一致性的Cronbachα系数大于.73。在测试结果与自我报告的疼痛严重程度或残疾之间未发现明显关联。结论:这些数据提供了支持LBP患者特伦德伦伯卧位和ASLR测试的重测信度的证据。这些测试结果的内部一致性对于两个评估者都很高,表明这些测试可以评估相同的维度。观察者在呼吸模式评估中的信度中等至中等。需要进一步研究观察者间的可靠性,临床重要性,有效性和特伦德伦伯卧位试验,ASLR试验以及这些试验过程中的呼吸方式的反应性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号