首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Health care burden of dyspepsia among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
【24h】

Health care burden of dyspepsia among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients

机译:非瓣膜性房颤患者消化不良的医疗保健负担

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although dyspepsia is common among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, its impact on patient health and cost has not been adequately studied. Objective: To evaluate the incremental health care burden associated with dyspepsia among NVAF patients and its impact on warfarin treatment. Methods: NVAF patients ≥ 18 years of age with continuous insurance coverage were identified (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009) from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Research databases. Patients with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient dyspepsia diagnoses within 12 months following any NVAF diagnosis were grouped into the dyspeptic cohort, and patients without any dyspepsia diagnosis were grouped into the nondyspeptic cohort. Of the overall cohorts, patients were matched by key patient characteristics. Dyspepsia was further categorized as having a prior history of dyspepsia (chronic) or no dyspepsia (nonchronic) during the baseline period. Health care resource utilization, associated costs, and warfarin use were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Of NVAF patients included in the study (N = 142,322), 10.4% were diagnosed with dyspepsia. After matching for key characteristics, NVAF patients with dyspepsia had significantly greater inpatient, outpatient, and prescription claims per patient year than those without dyspepsia (1.24 ± 1.21 vs. 0.36±0.68, P < 0.0001; 110.18 ± 101.03 vs. 66.98 ± 72.43, P < 0.0001; and 52.13 ± 35.30 vs. 44.29 ± 32.41, P < 0.0001, respectively). This greater number of claims was reflected in higher annual inpatient, outpatient, and prescription payments ($23,610 ± $54,748 vs. $5,509 ± $19,142, P < 0.0001; $18,182 ± $28,790 vs. $9,765 ± $22,009, P < 0.0001; and $4,661 ± $5,628 vs. $3,897 ± $4,586, P < 0.0001, respectively). NVAF patients with chronic dyspepsia were the least likely to take warfarin for stroke prevention. Conclusions: NVAF patients with dyspepsia experienced more all-cause hospitalizations and required more outpatient medical services, all associated with greater expenditures than NVAF patients without dyspepsia. Additionally, dyspepsia may be a barrier to warfarin use among NVAF patients.
机译:背景:尽管消化不良在非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中很常见,但其对患者健康和成本的影响尚未得到充分研究。目的:评估NVAF患者消化不良相关的增量医疗保健负担及其对华法林治疗的影响。方法:从MarketScan商业和Medicare研究数据库中识别出(≥2007年1月1日至2009年12月31日)具有连续保险范围的≥18岁的NVAF患者。在任何NVAF诊断后12个月内有1例住院或2例门诊消化不良的患者被归入消化不良人群,而无消化不良诊断的患者则被归入非消化不良人群。在总体队列中,患者符合关键患者特征。消化不良被进一步分类为在基线期间有消化不良(慢性)或没有消化不良(非慢性)的既往史。在12个月的随访期内评估了卫生保健资源的利用率,相关费用和华法林的使用。结果:纳入研究的NVAF患者(N = 142,322)中,有10.4%被诊断为消化不良。在对关键特征进行匹配之后,患有消化不良的NVAF患者每例每年的住院,门诊和处方索赔明显高于没有消化不良的患者(1.24±1.21 vs.0.36±0.68,P <0.0001; 110.18±101.03 vs.66.98±72.43, P <0.0001; 52.13±35.30与44.29±32.41,P <0.0001)。较高的理赔额反映在较高的年度住院,门诊和处方付款上($ 23,610±$ 54,748 vs. $ 5,509±$ 19,142,P <0.0001; $ 18,182±$ 28,790 vs. $ 9,765±$ 22,009,P <0.0001;以及$ 4,661±$ 5,628 vs. $ 3,897±$ 4,586,P <0.0001)。患有慢性消化不良的NVAF患者服用华法林预防中风的可能性最小。结论:消化不良的NVAF患者住院的原因更多,而且需要更多的门诊医疗服务,与无消化不良的NVAF患者相比,所有这些方面的支出都更大。此外,消化不良可能是NVAF患者使用华法林的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号